Immigrants from Scotland vs Immigrants from Turkey Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 130,049,371 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Turkey within Immigrant from Scotland communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.410. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Scotland within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.251% in Immigrants from Turkey. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Scotland corresponds to an increase of 251.4 Immigrants from Turkey.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Scotland and Immigrants from Turkey communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (28.7% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 6.6%), median female earnings ($41,771 compared to $44,066, a difference of 5.5%), and median earnings ($50,741 compared to $52,960, a difference of 4.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($66,620 compared to $66,672, a difference of 0.080%), householder income under 25 years ($52,638 compared to $52,503, a difference of 0.26%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($112,175 compared to $114,407, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Scotland and Immigrants from Turkey communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.5% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 14.1%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.3% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 12.6%), and male poverty (9.6% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 10.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single female poverty (19.4% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 0.32%), single mother poverty (27.6% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 1.0%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (15.2% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Scotland and Immigrants from Turkey communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 15.1%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.6% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 10.5%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.7% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 8.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.10%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.11%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.39%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Scotland and Immigrants from Turkey communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.5% compared to 34.9%, a difference of 10.3%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.2% compared to 66.3%, a difference of 3.2%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.8% compared to 73.7%, a difference of 2.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (85.4% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 0.010%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 0.34%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.1% compared to 85.5%, a difference of 0.46%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Scotland and Immigrants from Turkey communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (30.4% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 8.0%), divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 7.0%), and married-couple households (49.3% compared to 46.8%, a difference of 5.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.12 compared to 3.18, a difference of 1.9%), family households with children (26.8% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 2.3%), and family households (64.7% compared to 63.1%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Scotland and Immigrants from Turkey communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.3% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 37.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.7% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 17.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.8% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 16.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.8% compared to 88.6%, a difference of 3.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.9% compared to 53.6%, a difference of 9.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.8% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 16.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Scotland and Immigrants from Turkey communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 22.0%), no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 18.8%), and professional degree (5.3% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 17.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (88.2% compared to 87.9%, a difference of 0.30%), nursery school (98.4% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.35%), and kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.35%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Scotland and Immigrants from Turkey communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 28.7%), hearing disability (3.3% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 20.9%), and male disability (11.6% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 13.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (21.7% compared to 21.4%, a difference of 1.4%), disability age over 75 (45.1% compared to 45.9%, a difference of 1.7%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 4.9%).