Immigrants from Scotland vs Costa Rican Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 136,254,047 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Costa Ricans within Immigrant from Scotland communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.655. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Scotland within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.810% in Costa Ricans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Scotland corresponds to an increase of 809.7 Costa Ricans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Scotland and Costa Rican communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (28.7% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 13.6%), per capita income ($49,893 compared to $44,090, a difference of 13.2%), and median male earnings ($61,220 compared to $54,279, a difference of 12.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,638 compared to $53,106, a difference of 0.89%), median female earnings ($41,771 compared to $39,622, a difference of 5.4%), and median household income ($94,091 compared to $87,262, a difference of 7.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Scotland and Costa Rican communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.0% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 29.0%), married-couple family poverty (4.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 24.0%), and family poverty (7.3% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 22.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (12.7% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 1.1%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.6% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 1.3%), and single father poverty (16.7% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Scotland and Costa Rican communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.6% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 9.6%), unemployment (4.9% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 9.1%), and male unemployment (4.9% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 8.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.7% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 0.33%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 0.89%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Scotland and Costa Rican communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.5% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 6.0%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.2% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 2.1%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.8% compared to 75.2%, a difference of 0.77%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (79.6% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 0.17%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.0% compared to 82.8%, a difference of 0.28%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.4% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.45%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Scotland and Costa Rican communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.5% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 18.5%), single father households (2.1% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 13.1%), and births to unmarried women (30.4% compared to 32.7%, a difference of 7.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 0.45%), family households (64.7% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 1.9%), and average family size (3.12 compared to 3.26, a difference of 4.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Scotland and Costa Rican communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.3% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 14.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.9% compared to 56.9%, a difference of 3.4%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.7% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 2.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (20.8% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 1.2%), 1 or more vehicles in household (91.8% compared to 90.5%, a difference of 1.3%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.7% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Scotland and Costa Rican communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 35.1%), professional degree (5.3% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 17.5%), and doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 17.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.4% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.62%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.63%), and 1st grade (98.4% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.64%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Scotland and Costa Rican communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.3% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 13.8%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.8% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 8.2%), and male disability (11.6% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 5.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 35 to 64 (10.7% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 0.050%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.6% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 0.60%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 2.1%).