Immigrants from Scotland vs Immigrants from Germany Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 188,682,027 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Germany within Immigrant from Scotland communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.678. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Scotland within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.263% in Immigrants from Germany. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Scotland corresponds to an increase of 262.9 Immigrants from Germany.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Scotland and Immigrants from Germany communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($105,089 compared to $95,913, a difference of 9.6%), per capita income ($49,893 compared to $45,751, a difference of 9.0%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($112,175 compared to $103,282, a difference of 8.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,638 compared to $51,190, a difference of 2.8%), wage/income gap (28.7% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 4.3%), and median female earnings ($41,771 compared to $39,603, a difference of 5.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Scotland and Immigrants from Germany communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.0% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 19.3%), family poverty (7.3% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 16.2%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (13.7% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 15.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.7% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 1.4%), single male poverty (12.7% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 6.1%), and single mother poverty (27.6% compared to 29.5%, a difference of 6.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Scotland and Immigrants from Germany communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 5.9%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.2% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 5.4%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.2% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 5.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.2% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 0.11%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.22%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.27%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Scotland and Immigrants from Germany communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.5% compared to 39.1%, a difference of 1.6%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.4% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 1.2%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.0% compared to 82.1%, a difference of 1.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.2% compared to 63.9%, a difference of 0.49%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.8% compared to 76.2%, a difference of 0.55%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 0.92%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Scotland and Immigrants from Germany communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.5% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 12.0%), single father households (2.1% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 9.3%), and births to unmarried women (30.4% compared to 32.8%, a difference of 7.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.7% compared to 64.3%, a difference of 0.62%), family households with children (26.8% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 0.64%), and average family size (3.12 compared to 3.15, a difference of 0.99%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Scotland and Immigrants from Germany communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.3% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 4.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.7% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 1.9%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (58.9% compared to 57.9%, a difference of 1.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (20.8% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 0.15%), 1 or more vehicles in household (91.8% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 0.40%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (58.9% compared to 57.9%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Scotland and Immigrants from Germany communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (17.4% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 10.1%), bachelor's degree (42.3% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 9.6%), and no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 8.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.4% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.15%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.15%), and 1st grade (98.4% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.15%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Scotland and Immigrants from Germany communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.7% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 10.7%), vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 9.3%), and disability age 65 to 74 (21.7% compared to 23.4%, a difference of 8.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (45.1% compared to 46.7%, a difference of 3.6%), disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 3.8%), and hearing disability (3.3% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 4.1%).