Immigrants from Scotland vs European Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 195,873,982 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Europeans within Immigrant from Scotland communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.294. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Scotland within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.299% in Europeans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Scotland corresponds to an increase of 298.7 Europeans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Scotland and European communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($49,893 compared to $45,836, a difference of 8.8%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($105,089 compared to $98,310, a difference of 6.9%), and median male earnings ($61,220 compared to $57,637, a difference of 6.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,638 compared to $51,796, a difference of 1.6%), wage/income gap (28.7% compared to 29.4%, a difference of 2.3%), and householder income over 65 years ($66,620 compared to $63,779, a difference of 4.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Scotland and European communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.6% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 10.2%), single female poverty (19.4% compared to 21.1%, a difference of 8.7%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.2% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 8.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.5% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 0.37%), single father poverty (16.7% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 0.39%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.3% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Scotland and European communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.2% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 5.6%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.2% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 5.5%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.4% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 5.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 1.1%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.6% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 1.5%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.6% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Scotland and European communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.5% compared to 41.1%, a difference of 6.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.8% compared to 77.1%, a difference of 1.7%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.4% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.98%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (79.6% compared to 79.3%, a difference of 0.36%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.0% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 0.44%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 0.67%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Scotland and European communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.1% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 9.6%), single mother households (5.5% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 4.1%), and family households with children (26.8% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 4.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (49.3% compared to 49.3%, a difference of 0.020%), average family size (3.12 compared to 3.14, a difference of 0.50%), and family households (64.7% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 0.52%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Scotland and European communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.3% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 17.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.7% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 14.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.8% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 9.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.8% compared to 93.0%, a difference of 1.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.9% compared to 61.4%, a difference of 4.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.8% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 9.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Scotland and European communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 10.2%), master's degree (17.4% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 10.0%), and professional degree (5.3% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 8.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (93.0% compared to 93.1%, a difference of 0.030%), high school diploma (91.3% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 0.12%), and nursery school (98.4% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.16%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Scotland and European communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 11.0%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.7% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 8.9%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.8% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 8.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 0.040%), ambulatory disability (6.0% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 2.0%), and female disability (12.0% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 3.2%).