Immigrants from Scotland vs Immigrants from Russia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 167,256,655 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Russia within Immigrant from Scotland communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.026. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Scotland within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.009% in Immigrants from Russia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Scotland corresponds to an increase of 9.2 Immigrants from Russia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Scotland and Immigrants from Russia communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (28.7% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 8.9%), median female earnings ($41,771 compared to $44,680, a difference of 7.0%), and householder income under 25 years ($52,638 compared to $55,891, a difference of 6.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($112,175 compared to $113,215, a difference of 0.93%), median family income ($114,392 compared to $116,942, a difference of 2.2%), and median household income ($94,091 compared to $96,378, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Scotland and Immigrants from Russia communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.5% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 27.5%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.3% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 23.8%), and married-couple family poverty (4.2% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 21.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single female poverty (19.4% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 0.15%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.2% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 0.46%), and single mother poverty (27.6% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 0.71%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Scotland and Immigrants from Russia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.6% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 13.9%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 10.8%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.8% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 8.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.91%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 1.3%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.7% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Scotland and Immigrants from Russia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.5% compared to 34.1%, a difference of 13.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.8% compared to 73.5%, a difference of 3.2%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.2% compared to 65.3%, a difference of 1.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.11%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.0% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 0.21%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.1% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 0.25%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Scotland and Immigrants from Russia communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (30.4% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 12.0%), single father households (2.1% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 6.1%), and divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 5.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother households (5.5% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 0.18%), family households with children (26.8% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 0.23%), and average family size (3.12 compared to 3.16, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Scotland and Immigrants from Russia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.3% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 81.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.7% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 25.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.8% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 23.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.8% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 7.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.9% compared to 50.3%, a difference of 17.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.8% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 23.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Scotland and Immigrants from Russia communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 25.2%), doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 16.3%), and professional degree (5.3% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 15.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.4% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.44%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.44%), and 1st grade (98.4% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.45%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Scotland and Immigrants from Russia communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 27.5%), hearing disability (3.3% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 14.7%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.8% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 12.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (21.7% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 0.31%), ambulatory disability (6.0% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 2.1%), and female disability (12.0% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 3.2%).