Immigrants from Scotland vs Immigrants from Uganda Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 86,651,867 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Uganda within Immigrant from Scotland communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.316. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Scotland within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.108% in Immigrants from Uganda. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Scotland corresponds to an increase of 108.2 Immigrants from Uganda.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Scotland and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (28.7% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 15.2%), per capita income ($49,893 compared to $45,043, a difference of 10.8%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($105,089 compared to $95,698, a difference of 9.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,638 compared to $52,374, a difference of 0.50%), median female earnings ($41,771 compared to $40,739, a difference of 2.5%), and median earnings ($50,741 compared to $48,041, a difference of 5.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Scotland and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.0% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 32.3%), married-couple family poverty (4.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 25.0%), and family poverty (7.3% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 23.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.7% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 0.13%), single male poverty (12.7% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 0.47%), and single mother poverty (27.6% compared to 28.3%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Scotland and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.2% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 15.4%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 15.3%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.2% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 10.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.2% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 0.40%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.4% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 1.1%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.6% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Scotland and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (64.2% compared to 67.5%, a difference of 5.1%), in labor force | age 16-19 (38.5% compared to 39.2%, a difference of 1.9%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.6% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 1.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.1% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.11%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.8% compared to 76.0%, a difference of 0.30%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.45%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Scotland and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.5% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 19.7%), single father households (2.1% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 14.7%), and married-couple households (49.3% compared to 44.6%, a difference of 10.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (30.4% compared to 30.5%, a difference of 0.37%), divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 2.1%), and family households (64.7% compared to 62.7%, a difference of 3.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Scotland and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.3% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 20.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.8% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 13.1%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.7% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 12.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.8% compared to 90.1%, a difference of 1.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.9% compared to 55.0%, a difference of 7.1%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.7% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 12.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Scotland and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 42.0%), master's degree (17.4% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 4.5%), and associate's degree (50.6% compared to 48.5%, a difference of 4.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2nd grade (98.3% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.57%), nursery school (98.4% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.58%), and kindergarten (98.4% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.58%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Scotland and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 19.2%), hearing disability (3.3% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 16.5%), and cognitive disability (16.2% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 11.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 0.19%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.8% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 1.5%), and female disability (12.0% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 2.1%).