Immigrants from Scotland vs Immigrants from Peru Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 160,073,396 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Peru within Immigrant from Scotland communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.269. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Scotland within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.076% in Immigrants from Peru. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Scotland corresponds to an increase of 76.4 Immigrants from Peru.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Scotland and Immigrants from Peru communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (28.7% compared to 25.1%, a difference of 14.4%), per capita income ($49,893 compared to $43,852, a difference of 13.8%), and median male earnings ($61,220 compared to $54,695, a difference of 11.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($41,771 compared to $39,871, a difference of 4.8%), median household income ($94,091 compared to $89,010, a difference of 5.7%), and householder income under 25 years ($52,638 compared to $56,384, a difference of 7.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Scotland and Immigrants from Peru communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.0% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 33.9%), married-couple family poverty (4.2% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 30.4%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.5% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 29.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single female poverty (19.4% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 0.37%), single mother poverty (27.6% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 0.39%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.2% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 4.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Scotland and Immigrants from Peru communities in the United States are seen in female unemployment (4.9% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 11.3%), unemployment (4.9% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 10.3%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.2% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 10.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.2% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 0.59%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 0.79%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.6% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Scotland and Immigrants from Peru communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.5% compared to 34.2%, a difference of 12.7%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.2% compared to 66.3%, a difference of 3.2%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.8% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 1.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 0.26%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.1% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.50%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.0% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 0.65%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Scotland and Immigrants from Peru communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.5% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 21.3%), single father households (2.1% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 15.5%), and family households with children (26.8% compared to 28.9%, a difference of 7.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 0.32%), family households (64.7% compared to 67.2%, a difference of 3.9%), and married-couple households (49.3% compared to 47.3%, a difference of 4.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Scotland and Immigrants from Peru communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.3% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 37.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.9% compared to 54.4%, a difference of 8.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.8% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 7.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.8% compared to 88.6%, a difference of 3.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.7% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 4.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.8% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 7.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Scotland and Immigrants from Peru communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 54.3%), doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 24.9%), and professional degree (5.3% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 19.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.4% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.95%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.96%), and 1st grade (98.4% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.97%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Scotland and Immigrants from Peru communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.3% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 23.7%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.8% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 16.3%), and male disability (11.6% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 12.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 0.16%), self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 1.8%), and cognitive disability (16.2% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 2.3%).