Immigrants from Scotland vs Hmong Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from Scotland
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianCosta RicanCreekCroatianCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHungarianIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsagePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYaquiYugoslavianYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Hmong
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from Scotland

Hmong

Excellent
Average
9,011
SOCIAL INDEX
87.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
36th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
4,737
SOCIAL INDEX
44.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
196th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Hmong Integration in Immigrants from Scotland Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 22,035,133 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Hmong within Immigrant from Scotland communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.338. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Scotland within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.235% in Hmong. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Scotland corresponds to an increase of 235.5 Hmong.
Immigrants from Scotland Integration in Hmong Communities

Immigrants from Scotland vs Hmong Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Scotland and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($49,893 compared to $38,120, a difference of 30.9%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($112,175 compared to $88,115, a difference of 27.3%), and median male earnings ($61,220 compared to $48,254, a difference of 26.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (28.7% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 3.7%), householder income under 25 years ($52,638 compared to $49,364, a difference of 6.6%), and median female earnings ($41,771 compared to $35,498, a difference of 17.7%).
Immigrants from Scotland vs Hmong Income
Income MetricImmigrants from ScotlandHmong
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$49,893
Tragic
$38,120
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$114,392
Tragic
$91,296
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$94,091
Tragic
$75,839
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$50,741
Tragic
$42,111
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$61,220
Tragic
$48,254
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$41,771
Tragic
$35,498
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Good
$52,638
Tragic
$49,364
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$105,089
Tragic
$84,258
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$112,175
Tragic
$88,115
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$66,620
Tragic
$56,339
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
28.7%
Tragic
27.7%

Immigrants from Scotland vs Hmong Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Scotland and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among girls under 16 (14.0% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 24.6%), child poverty under the age of 16 (13.7% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 24.4%), and family poverty (7.3% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 24.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.7% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 5.2%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.6% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 8.0%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.3% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 11.9%).
Immigrants from Scotland vs Hmong Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from ScotlandHmong
Poverty
Exceptional
10.6%
Poor
12.8%
Families
Exceptional
7.3%
Average
9.1%
Males
Exceptional
9.6%
Poor
11.6%
Females
Exceptional
11.5%
Fair
13.9%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
18.6%
Average
20.0%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
12.2%
Fair
13.9%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
15.2%
Tragic
18.5%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.7%
Poor
17.1%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.1%
Fair
16.6%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.0%
Poor
17.5%
Single Males
Good
12.7%
Tragic
14.2%
Single Females
Exceptional
19.4%
Tragic
23.1%
Single Fathers
Tragic
16.7%
Exceptional
15.9%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
27.6%
Tragic
31.2%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.2%
Excellent
5.0%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.3%
Exceptional
10.4%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
10.5%
Good
12.0%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.0%
Excellent
10.9%

Immigrants from Scotland vs Hmong Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Scotland and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 48.6%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 23.0%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.7% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 22.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment (4.9% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 2.1%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.8% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 3.3%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.4% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 4.8%).
Immigrants from Scotland vs Hmong Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from ScotlandHmong
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.9%
Exceptional
5.0%
Males
Exceptional
4.9%
Tragic
5.5%
Females
Exceptional
4.9%
Exceptional
4.4%
Youth < 25
Excellent
11.4%
Exceptional
10.8%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
16.8%
Exceptional
16.3%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Good
10.2%
Exceptional
9.4%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Fair
6.7%
Exceptional
5.7%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Average
5.4%
Exceptional
4.9%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Tragic
5.0%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Exceptional
3.7%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Tragic
5.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.6%
Exceptional
4.0%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Exceptional
4.2%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
4.2%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.2%
Tragic
13.7%
Women w/ Children < 6
Good
7.6%
Exceptional
6.7%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
9.2%
Exceptional
8.7%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
5.2%
Exceptional
4.5%

Immigrants from Scotland vs Hmong Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Scotland and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 30-34 (85.1% compared to 82.4%, a difference of 3.3%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 2.5%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.6% compared to 77.9%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.2% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 0.25%), in labor force | age 16-19 (38.5% compared to 38.7%, a difference of 0.60%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.8% compared to 76.5%, a difference of 0.97%).
Immigrants from Scotland vs Hmong Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from ScotlandHmong
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
64.2%
Tragic
64.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Average
79.6%
Tragic
77.9%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
38.5%
Exceptional
38.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
75.8%
Exceptional
76.5%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
85.4%
Tragic
83.7%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.1%
Tragic
82.4%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Excellent
84.7%
Tragic
82.6%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Good
83.0%
Tragic
81.7%

Immigrants from Scotland vs Hmong Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Scotland and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.5% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 16.3%), single father households (2.1% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 14.0%), and births to unmarried women (30.4% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 9.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.7% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 0.27%), divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 2.6%), and average family size (3.12 compared to 3.21, a difference of 2.7%).
Immigrants from Scotland vs Hmong Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from ScotlandHmong
Family Households
Excellent
64.7%
Exceptional
64.9%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.8%
Exceptional
28.6%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
49.3%
Good
47.0%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.12
Fair
3.21
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.1%
Fair
2.4%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.5%
Fair
6.4%
Currently Married
Exceptional
49.3%
Good
47.1%
Divorced or Separated
Good
12.0%
Tragic
12.3%
Births to Unmarried Women
Excellent
30.4%
Exceptional
27.7%

Immigrants from Scotland vs Hmong Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Scotland and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.3% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 24.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.7% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 4.8%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (91.8% compared to 89.6%, a difference of 2.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (20.8% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 0.89%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.9% compared to 57.8%, a difference of 1.9%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (91.8% compared to 89.6%, a difference of 2.4%).
Immigrants from Scotland vs Hmong Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from ScotlandHmong
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.3%
Average
10.4%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
91.8%
Average
89.6%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
58.9%
Exceptional
57.8%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
20.8%
Exceptional
21.0%
4+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
6.7%
Exceptional
7.0%

Immigrants from Scotland vs Hmong Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Scotland and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.3% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 40.2%), doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 38.0%), and master's degree (17.4% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 29.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.37%), 1st grade (98.4% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.37%), and nursery school (98.4% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.38%).
Immigrants from Scotland vs Hmong Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from ScotlandHmong
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.6%
Excellent
1.9%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.4%
Good
98.1%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.4%
Good
98.1%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Good
98.0%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Good
98.0%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Excellent
97.9%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Excellent
97.7%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Exceptional
97.6%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Exceptional
97.4%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.1%
Exceptional
96.4%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.8%
Excellent
96.1%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.1%
Excellent
95.2%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.2%
Excellent
94.1%
11th Grade
Exceptional
94.2%
Good
92.8%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
93.0%
Average
91.3%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
91.3%
Average
89.1%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
88.2%
Poor
84.9%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
69.4%
Tragic
63.5%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
63.4%
Tragic
57.2%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
50.6%
Tragic
43.4%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
42.3%
Tragic
34.8%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
17.4%
Tragic
13.4%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
5.3%
Tragic
3.7%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.2%
Tragic
1.6%

Immigrants from Scotland vs Hmong Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Scotland and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.7% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 22.4%), disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 21.2%), and disability age 65 to 74 (21.7% compared to 25.7%, a difference of 18.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 1.1%), hearing disability (3.3% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 2.9%), and disability age over 75 (45.1% compared to 48.2%, a difference of 6.8%).
Immigrants from Scotland vs Hmong Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from ScotlandHmong
Disability
Fair
11.8%
Tragic
12.8%
Males
Tragic
11.6%
Tragic
12.5%
Females
Good
12.0%
Tragic
13.1%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.4%
Exceptional
1.1%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Good
5.6%
Tragic
6.3%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Poor
6.8%
Tragic
8.1%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.7%
Tragic
13.1%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
21.7%
Tragic
25.7%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
45.1%
Tragic
48.2%
Vision
Exceptional
2.1%
Tragic
2.3%
Hearing
Tragic
3.3%
Tragic
3.4%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.2%
Tragic
18.4%
Ambulatory
Good
6.0%
Tragic
6.6%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.4%
Excellent
2.4%