Immigrants from Scotland vs Immigrants from Chile Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 126,393,326 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Chile within Immigrant from Scotland communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.641. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Scotland within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.730% in Immigrants from Chile. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Scotland corresponds to an increase of 729.6 Immigrants from Chile.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Scotland and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (28.7% compared to 25.7%, a difference of 11.7%), median male earnings ($61,220 compared to $55,954, a difference of 9.4%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($112,175 compared to $103,412, a difference of 8.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,638 compared to $52,440, a difference of 0.38%), median female earnings ($41,771 compared to $40,353, a difference of 3.5%), and median earnings ($50,741 compared to $47,697, a difference of 6.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Scotland and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.0% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 27.6%), married-couple family poverty (4.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 27.4%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.3% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 26.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (27.6% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 2.8%), single female poverty (19.4% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 3.5%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.6% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 4.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Scotland and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 18.2%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.6% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 7.6%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.8% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 7.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 0.18%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.4% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 0.74%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.88%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Scotland and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.5% compared to 34.8%, a difference of 10.7%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.2% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 2.6%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.8% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 2.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.070%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.1% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.14%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.0% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 0.25%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Scotland and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.5% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 13.9%), currently married (49.3% compared to 46.4%, a difference of 6.4%), and married-couple households (49.3% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 5.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.7% compared to 64.6%, a difference of 0.22%), divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 0.96%), and births to unmarried women (30.4% compared to 31.2%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Scotland and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.3% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 31.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.8% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 10.5%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.7% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 9.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.8% compared to 89.1%, a difference of 3.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.9% compared to 54.2%, a difference of 8.6%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.7% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 9.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Scotland and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 33.6%), college, under 1 year (69.4% compared to 66.8%, a difference of 3.9%), and master's degree (17.4% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 3.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of professional degree (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.24%), nursery school (98.4% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.58%), and kindergarten (98.4% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.59%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Scotland and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.3% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 18.7%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.8% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 11.5%), and male disability (11.6% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 9.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 0.25%), self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 0.36%), and disability age 65 to 74 (21.7% compared to 22.1%, a difference of 1.8%).