Immigrants from Scotland vs Immigrants from India Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 183,620,729 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from India within Immigrant from Scotland communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.398. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Scotland within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.771% in Immigrants from India. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Scotland corresponds to an increase of 771.2 Immigrants from India.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Scotland and Immigrants from India communities in the United States are seen in median male earnings ($61,220 compared to $74,207, a difference of 21.2%), median household income ($94,091 compared to $113,009, a difference of 20.1%), and median earnings ($50,741 compared to $60,648, a difference of 19.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($66,620 compared to $72,804, a difference of 9.3%), wage/income gap (28.7% compared to 31.5%, a difference of 9.8%), and per capita income ($49,893 compared to $55,268, a difference of 10.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Scotland and Immigrants from India communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (15.2% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 32.0%), child poverty among boys under 16 (14.1% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 29.5%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (13.7% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 27.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.5% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 0.98%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.3% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 5.9%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.6% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 13.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Scotland and Immigrants from India communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.6% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 24.2%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.4% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 21.0%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.2% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 20.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.6% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 0.85%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 2.1%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 3.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Scotland and Immigrants from India communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.5% compared to 35.0%, a difference of 9.8%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.2% compared to 67.6%, a difference of 5.3%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.6% compared to 81.3%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.1% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.13%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.4% compared to 85.7%, a difference of 0.31%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 0.75%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Scotland and Immigrants from India communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (30.4% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 32.8%), divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 19.1%), and family households with children (26.8% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 15.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.12 compared to 3.21, a difference of 2.6%), family households (64.7% compared to 67.4%, a difference of 4.3%), and currently married (49.3% compared to 51.8%, a difference of 4.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Scotland and Immigrants from India communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.7% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 5.1%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.8% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 2.9%), and no vehicles in household (8.3% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 2.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.8% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 0.14%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.9% compared to 59.3%, a difference of 0.67%), and no vehicles in household (8.3% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Scotland and Immigrants from India communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 30.5%), master's degree (17.4% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 28.4%), and bachelor's degree (42.3% compared to 51.3%, a difference of 21.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (95.2% compared to 95.3%, a difference of 0.070%), 9th grade (96.1% compared to 96.1%, a difference of 0.090%), and nursery school (98.4% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.14%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Scotland and Immigrants from India communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.3% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 31.9%), disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 1.0%, a difference of 31.2%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.7% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 29.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (45.1% compared to 45.2%, a difference of 0.14%), cognitive disability (16.2% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 1.8%), and disability age 65 to 74 (21.7% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 10.1%).