Immigrants from Scotland vs Immigrants from Zaire Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 73,015,491 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Zaire within Immigrant from Scotland communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.433. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Scotland within a typical geography, there is an increase of 4.449% in Immigrants from Zaire. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Scotland corresponds to an increase of 4,448.9 Immigrants from Zaire.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Scotland and Immigrants from Zaire communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($105,089 compared to $78,045, a difference of 34.6%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($112,175 compared to $85,207, a difference of 31.7%), and median household income ($94,091 compared to $71,801, a difference of 31.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,638 compared to $45,529, a difference of 15.6%), median female earnings ($41,771 compared to $36,017, a difference of 16.0%), and householder income over 65 years ($66,620 compared to $54,512, a difference of 22.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Scotland and Immigrants from Zaire communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.0% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 48.5%), child poverty under the age of 16 (13.7% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 46.4%), and family poverty (7.3% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 46.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.7% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 3.5%), single male poverty (12.7% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 7.3%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.5% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 13.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Scotland and Immigrants from Zaire communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 28.0%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.7% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 10.8%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 10.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female unemployment (4.9% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 2.0%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.2% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 2.4%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.7% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 3.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Scotland and Immigrants from Zaire communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.5% compared to 40.7%, a difference of 5.7%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.2% compared to 67.2%, a difference of 4.6%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.8% compared to 76.6%, a difference of 1.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.10%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.0% compared to 82.8%, a difference of 0.25%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.6% compared to 79.9%, a difference of 0.39%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Scotland and Immigrants from Zaire communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.5% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 34.9%), married-couple households (49.3% compared to 40.1%, a difference of 23.0%), and currently married (49.3% compared to 42.0%, a difference of 17.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.8% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 0.39%), average family size (3.12 compared to 3.22, a difference of 3.0%), and divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 6.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Scotland and Immigrants from Zaire communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.3% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 34.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.7% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 30.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.8% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 24.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.8% compared to 88.8%, a difference of 3.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.9% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 14.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.8% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 24.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Scotland and Immigrants from Zaire communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 39.4%), master's degree (17.4% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 18.1%), and professional degree (5.3% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 17.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3rd grade (98.3% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.69%), nursery school (98.4% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.70%), and kindergarten (98.4% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.71%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Scotland and Immigrants from Zaire communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 20.8%), cognitive disability (16.2% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 19.8%), and hearing disability (3.3% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 17.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability (11.8% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 0.38%), ambulatory disability (6.0% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 0.92%), and male disability (11.6% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 2.0%).