Immigrants from Scotland vs Alaska Native Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 57,316,359 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Alaska Natives within Immigrant from Scotland communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.769. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Scotland within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.266% in Alaska Natives. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Scotland corresponds to an increase of 266.0 Alaska Natives.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Scotland and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($49,893 compared to $39,558, a difference of 26.1%), median male earnings ($61,220 compared to $49,711, a difference of 23.2%), and median family income ($114,392 compared to $95,573, a difference of 19.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,638 compared to $54,000, a difference of 2.6%), median female earnings ($41,771 compared to $38,202, a difference of 9.3%), and householder income over 65 years ($66,620 compared to $60,748, a difference of 9.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Scotland and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.0% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 73.5%), married-couple family poverty (4.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 49.5%), and family poverty (7.3% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 41.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.7% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 8.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.5% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 8.5%), and single mother poverty (27.6% compared to 30.9%, a difference of 12.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Scotland and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.6% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 65.1%), male unemployment (4.9% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 63.3%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 58.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.2% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 11.7%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 25.4%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.6% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 26.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Scotland and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 25-29 (85.4% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 4.7%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.1% compared to 81.3%, a difference of 4.6%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 3.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.8% compared to 75.9%, a difference of 0.10%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.2% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 0.74%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.0% compared to 81.8%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Scotland and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.1% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 68.6%), single mother households (5.5% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 34.8%), and births to unmarried women (30.4% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 26.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.7% compared to 65.1%, a difference of 0.58%), divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 3.7%), and married-couple households (49.3% compared to 45.6%, a difference of 8.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Scotland and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.3% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 108.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.7% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 10.2%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (58.9% compared to 53.6%, a difference of 9.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (20.8% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 0.89%), 1 or more vehicles in household (91.8% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 9.5%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (58.9% compared to 53.6%, a difference of 9.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Scotland and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.3% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 51.7%), doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 50.5%), and master's degree (17.4% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 49.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (96.1% compared to 96.1%, a difference of 0.080%), 8th grade (96.8% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 0.20%), and 5th grade (98.0% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.22%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Scotland and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 114.6%), disability age 65 to 74 (21.7% compared to 30.6%, a difference of 41.3%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.7% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 34.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 1.7%), ambulatory disability (6.0% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 2.4%), and female disability (12.0% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 6.1%).