Immigrants from Scotland vs Bahamian Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from Scotland
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Bahamian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from Scotland

Bahamians

Excellent
Tragic
9,011
SOCIAL INDEX
87.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
36th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
919
SOCIAL INDEX
6.7/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
334th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Bahamian Integration in Immigrants from Scotland Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 73,197,279 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Bahamians within Immigrant from Scotland communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.699. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Scotland within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.533% in Bahamians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Scotland corresponds to an increase of 532.8 Bahamians.
Immigrants from Scotland Integration in Bahamian Communities

Immigrants from Scotland vs Bahamian Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Scotland and Bahamian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (28.7% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 41.9%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($105,089 compared to $75,395, a difference of 39.4%), and median family income ($114,392 compared to $82,631, a difference of 38.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,638 compared to $45,743, a difference of 15.1%), median female earnings ($41,771 compared to $35,125, a difference of 18.9%), and median earnings ($50,741 compared to $39,735, a difference of 27.7%).
Immigrants from Scotland vs Bahamian Income
Income MetricImmigrants from ScotlandBahamian
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$49,893
Tragic
$36,427
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$114,392
Tragic
$82,631
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$94,091
Tragic
$69,726
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$50,741
Tragic
$39,735
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$61,220
Tragic
$44,756
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$41,771
Tragic
$35,125
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Good
$52,638
Tragic
$45,743
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$105,089
Tragic
$75,395
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$112,175
Tragic
$81,369
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$66,620
Tragic
$51,000
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
28.7%
Exceptional
20.2%

Immigrants from Scotland vs Bahamian Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Scotland and Bahamian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.0% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 89.0%), married-couple family poverty (4.2% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 59.5%), and family poverty (7.3% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 59.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.7% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 7.6%), single mother poverty (27.6% compared to 31.3%, a difference of 13.5%), and single male poverty (12.7% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 14.9%).
Immigrants from Scotland vs Bahamian Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from ScotlandBahamian
Poverty
Exceptional
10.6%
Tragic
15.4%
Families
Exceptional
7.3%
Tragic
11.7%
Males
Exceptional
9.6%
Tragic
14.1%
Females
Exceptional
11.5%
Tragic
16.6%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
18.6%
Tragic
21.8%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
12.2%
Tragic
16.1%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
15.2%
Tragic
23.0%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.7%
Tragic
21.5%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.1%
Tragic
21.6%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.0%
Tragic
21.5%
Single Males
Good
12.7%
Tragic
14.6%
Single Females
Exceptional
19.4%
Tragic
22.7%
Single Fathers
Tragic
16.7%
Tragic
18.0%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
27.6%
Tragic
31.3%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.2%
Tragic
6.6%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.3%
Tragic
14.2%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
10.5%
Tragic
15.5%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.0%
Tragic
17.0%

Immigrants from Scotland vs Bahamian Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Scotland and Bahamian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.2% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 22.3%), unemployment (4.9% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 22.0%), and female unemployment (4.9% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 21.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.7% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 2.5%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 6.2%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 9.4%).
Immigrants from Scotland vs Bahamian Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from ScotlandBahamian
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.9%
Tragic
5.9%
Males
Exceptional
4.9%
Tragic
5.9%
Females
Exceptional
4.9%
Tragic
6.0%
Youth < 25
Excellent
11.4%
Tragic
13.1%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
16.8%
Tragic
19.8%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Good
10.2%
Tragic
11.6%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Fair
6.7%
Tragic
7.5%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Average
5.4%
Tragic
6.6%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Tragic
5.2%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Tragic
4.9%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Good
4.8%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.6%
Tragic
5.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Tragic
5.7%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
5.3%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.2%
Exceptional
7.8%
Women w/ Children < 6
Good
7.6%
Tragic
8.7%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
9.2%
Tragic
10.4%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
5.2%
Tragic
6.3%

Immigrants from Scotland vs Bahamian Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Scotland and Bahamian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.5% compared to 34.6%, a difference of 11.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.8% compared to 73.3%, a difference of 3.5%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.4% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.2% compared to 64.2%, a difference of 0.070%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.080%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.0% compared to 82.2%, a difference of 1.0%).
Immigrants from Scotland vs Bahamian Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from ScotlandBahamian
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
64.2%
Tragic
64.2%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Average
79.6%
Tragic
78.4%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
38.5%
Tragic
34.6%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
75.8%
Tragic
73.3%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
85.4%
Tragic
83.7%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.1%
Tragic
83.9%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Excellent
84.7%
Exceptional
84.7%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Good
83.0%
Tragic
82.2%

Immigrants from Scotland vs Bahamian Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Scotland and Bahamian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.5% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 50.4%), births to unmarried women (30.4% compared to 40.8%, a difference of 34.1%), and married-couple households (49.3% compared to 40.5%, a difference of 21.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.8% compared to 26.5%, a difference of 1.3%), family households (64.7% compared to 63.3%, a difference of 2.2%), and average family size (3.12 compared to 3.28, a difference of 4.9%).
Immigrants from Scotland vs Bahamian Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from ScotlandBahamian
Family Households
Excellent
64.7%
Tragic
63.3%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.8%
Tragic
26.5%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
49.3%
Tragic
40.5%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.12
Exceptional
3.28
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.1%
Tragic
2.5%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.5%
Tragic
8.3%
Currently Married
Exceptional
49.3%
Tragic
41.2%
Divorced or Separated
Good
12.0%
Tragic
14.2%
Births to Unmarried Women
Excellent
30.4%
Tragic
40.8%

Immigrants from Scotland vs Bahamian Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Scotland and Bahamian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.7% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 31.2%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.8% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 22.8%), and no vehicles in household (8.3% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 18.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.8% compared to 90.2%, a difference of 1.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.9% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 14.3%), and no vehicles in household (8.3% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 18.8%).
Immigrants from Scotland vs Bahamian Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from ScotlandBahamian
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.3%
Excellent
9.9%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
91.8%
Excellent
90.2%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
58.9%
Tragic
51.5%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
20.8%
Tragic
16.9%
4+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
6.7%
Tragic
5.1%

Immigrants from Scotland vs Bahamian Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Scotland and Bahamian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 48.1%), professional degree (5.3% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 42.6%), and master's degree (17.4% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 40.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.4% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.66%), 1st grade (98.4% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.67%), and kindergarten (98.4% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.68%).
Immigrants from Scotland vs Bahamian Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from ScotlandBahamian
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.6%
Poor
2.2%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.4%
Tragic
97.8%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.4%
Tragic
97.8%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Tragic
97.7%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
97.7%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
97.5%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Tragic
97.2%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Tragic
97.0%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Tragic
96.7%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.1%
Poor
95.7%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.8%
Tragic
95.3%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.1%
Tragic
94.4%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.2%
Tragic
93.1%
11th Grade
Exceptional
94.2%
Tragic
91.6%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
93.0%
Tragic
89.9%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
91.3%
Tragic
87.5%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
88.2%
Tragic
83.6%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
69.4%
Tragic
60.3%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
63.4%
Tragic
54.5%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
50.6%
Tragic
41.5%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
42.3%
Tragic
32.5%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
17.4%
Tragic
12.4%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
5.3%
Tragic
3.7%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.2%
Tragic
1.5%

Immigrants from Scotland vs Bahamian Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Scotland and Bahamian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.3% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 17.0%), vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 16.8%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.6% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 13.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male disability (11.6% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 2.8%), disability (11.8% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 3.1%), and female disability (12.0% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 3.3%).
Immigrants from Scotland vs Bahamian Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from ScotlandBahamian
Disability
Fair
11.8%
Tragic
12.2%
Males
Tragic
11.6%
Tragic
11.9%
Females
Good
12.0%
Poor
12.4%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.4%
Tragic
1.3%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Good
5.6%
Tragic
6.3%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Poor
6.8%
Average
6.6%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.7%
Poor
11.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
21.7%
Tragic
24.4%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
45.1%
Tragic
48.0%
Vision
Exceptional
2.1%
Tragic
2.4%
Hearing
Tragic
3.3%
Excellent
2.9%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.2%
Tragic
17.9%
Ambulatory
Good
6.0%
Tragic
6.6%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.4%
Tragic
2.6%