Immigrants from Scotland vs Immigrants from Singapore Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 94,483,160 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Singapore within Immigrant from Scotland communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.675. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Scotland within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.142% in Immigrants from Singapore. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Scotland corresponds to an increase of 141.5 Immigrants from Singapore.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Scotland and Immigrants from Singapore communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($105,089 compared to $124,429, a difference of 18.4%), median family income ($114,392 compared to $134,818, a difference of 17.9%), and median household income ($94,091 compared to $110,428, a difference of 17.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (28.7% compared to 28.9%, a difference of 0.68%), householder income under 25 years ($52,638 compared to $56,835, a difference of 8.0%), and householder income over 65 years ($66,620 compared to $72,963, a difference of 9.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Scotland and Immigrants from Singapore communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (15.2% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 17.3%), single father poverty (16.7% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 17.1%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (14.1% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 12.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (4.2% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 1.4%), female poverty (11.5% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 2.3%), and poverty (10.6% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 3.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Scotland and Immigrants from Singapore communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.2% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 20.6%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.6% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 20.4%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 14.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.2% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 0.27%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.8% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 0.31%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.37%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Scotland and Immigrants from Singapore communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.5% compared to 33.5%, a difference of 14.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.8% compared to 72.4%, a difference of 4.7%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.2% compared to 66.2%, a difference of 3.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.1% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 0.26%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.0% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 0.32%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.6% compared to 79.9%, a difference of 0.36%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Scotland and Immigrants from Singapore communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (30.4% compared to 25.6%, a difference of 18.6%), divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 16.0%), and single father households (2.1% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 11.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.12 compared to 3.16, a difference of 1.0%), married-couple households (49.3% compared to 48.3%, a difference of 2.0%), and family households (64.7% compared to 63.1%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Scotland and Immigrants from Singapore communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.3% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 55.4%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.8% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 12.7%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.7% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 12.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.8% compared to 87.2%, a difference of 5.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.9% compared to 53.9%, a difference of 9.3%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.7% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 12.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Scotland and Immigrants from Singapore communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 69.8%), professional degree (5.3% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 47.4%), and master's degree (17.4% compared to 23.4%, a difference of 34.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (94.2% compared to 94.2%, a difference of 0.010%), nursery school (98.4% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.21%), and kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.21%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Scotland and Immigrants from Singapore communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 27.8%), hearing disability (3.3% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 25.9%), and male disability (11.6% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 21.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (45.1% compared to 45.6%, a difference of 1.1%), disability age 65 to 74 (21.7% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 6.1%), and cognitive disability (16.2% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 8.0%).