Immigrants from Scotland vs Zimbabwean Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 53,380,108 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Zimbabweans within Immigrant from Scotland communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.081. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Scotland within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.047% in Zimbabweans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Scotland corresponds to a decrease of 46.9 Zimbabweans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Scotland and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (28.7% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 9.2%), per capita income ($49,893 compared to $45,804, a difference of 8.9%), and median male earnings ($61,220 compared to $56,302, a difference of 8.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($66,620 compared to $65,854, a difference of 1.2%), median female earnings ($41,771 compared to $40,798, a difference of 2.4%), and householder income under 25 years ($52,638 compared to $51,259, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Scotland and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.6% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 10.1%), single father poverty (16.7% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 7.1%), and female poverty (11.5% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 6.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty under the age of 5 (15.2% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 0.070%), single female poverty (19.4% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 0.52%), and single mother poverty (27.6% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Scotland and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 14.8%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.4% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 12.2%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.4% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 11.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.2% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 0.010%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.51%), and unemployment (4.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Scotland and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (64.2% compared to 67.3%, a difference of 4.8%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.6% compared to 81.0%, a difference of 1.7%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 86.1%, a difference of 1.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.8% compared to 75.6%, a difference of 0.25%), in labor force | age 16-19 (38.5% compared to 38.7%, a difference of 0.59%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.1% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 0.62%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Scotland and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.5% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 10.5%), single father households (2.1% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 6.4%), and births to unmarried women (30.4% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 5.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.7% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 1.0%), average family size (3.12 compared to 3.20, a difference of 2.4%), and divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 3.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Scotland and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.3% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 8.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.7% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 3.4%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (58.9% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 2.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.8% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 0.82%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.8% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 2.7%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (58.9% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Scotland and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 6.1%), doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 4.8%), and bachelor's degree (42.3% compared to 43.3%, a difference of 2.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.4% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.13%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.13%), and 1st grade (98.4% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.13%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Scotland and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.3% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 17.4%), disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 16.5%), and ambulatory disability (6.0% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 12.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.6% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 0.29%), disability age 65 to 74 (21.7% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 0.58%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.7% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 2.8%).