Immigrants from Scotland vs Zimbabwean Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from Scotland
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYup'ik
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Zimbabwean
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from Scotland

Zimbabweans

Excellent
Exceptional
9,011
SOCIAL INDEX
87.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
36th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,358
SOCIAL INDEX
91.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
18th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Zimbabwean Integration in Immigrants from Scotland Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 53,380,108 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Zimbabweans within Immigrant from Scotland communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.081. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Scotland within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.047% in Zimbabweans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Scotland corresponds to a decrease of 46.9 Zimbabweans.
Immigrants from Scotland Integration in Zimbabwean Communities

Immigrants from Scotland vs Zimbabwean Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Scotland and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (28.7% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 9.2%), per capita income ($49,893 compared to $45,804, a difference of 8.9%), and median male earnings ($61,220 compared to $56,302, a difference of 8.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($66,620 compared to $65,854, a difference of 1.2%), median female earnings ($41,771 compared to $40,798, a difference of 2.4%), and householder income under 25 years ($52,638 compared to $51,259, a difference of 2.7%).
Immigrants from Scotland vs Zimbabwean Income
Income MetricImmigrants from ScotlandZimbabwean
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$49,893
Exceptional
$45,804
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$114,392
Exceptional
$110,011
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$94,091
Exceptional
$90,618
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$50,741
Exceptional
$48,229
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$61,220
Excellent
$56,302
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$41,771
Exceptional
$40,798
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Good
$52,638
Tragic
$51,259
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$105,089
Exceptional
$98,586
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$112,175
Exceptional
$106,849
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$66,620
Exceptional
$65,854
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
28.7%
Fair
26.3%

Immigrants from Scotland vs Zimbabwean Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Scotland and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.6% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 10.1%), single father poverty (16.7% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 7.1%), and female poverty (11.5% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 6.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty under the age of 5 (15.2% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 0.070%), single female poverty (19.4% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 0.52%), and single mother poverty (27.6% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 1.2%).
Immigrants from Scotland vs Zimbabwean Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from ScotlandZimbabwean
Poverty
Exceptional
10.6%
Exceptional
11.3%
Families
Exceptional
7.3%
Exceptional
7.8%
Males
Exceptional
9.6%
Exceptional
10.2%
Females
Exceptional
11.5%
Exceptional
12.3%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
18.6%
Fair
20.4%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
12.2%
Exceptional
11.7%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
15.2%
Exceptional
15.2%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.7%
Exceptional
14.2%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.1%
Exceptional
14.3%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.0%
Exceptional
14.4%
Single Males
Good
12.7%
Poor
13.1%
Single Females
Exceptional
19.4%
Exceptional
19.5%
Single Fathers
Tragic
16.7%
Exceptional
15.6%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
27.6%
Exceptional
27.9%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.2%
Exceptional
4.1%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.3%
Exceptional
9.6%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
10.5%
Exceptional
11.2%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.0%
Exceptional
9.5%

Immigrants from Scotland vs Zimbabwean Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Scotland and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 14.8%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.4% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 12.2%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.4% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 11.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.2% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 0.010%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.51%), and unemployment (4.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 2.0%).
Immigrants from Scotland vs Zimbabwean Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from ScotlandZimbabwean
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.9%
Exceptional
4.8%
Males
Exceptional
4.9%
Exceptional
4.8%
Females
Exceptional
4.9%
Exceptional
4.8%
Youth < 25
Excellent
11.4%
Exceptional
10.2%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
16.8%
Exceptional
15.4%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Good
10.2%
Exceptional
9.2%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Fair
6.7%
Exceptional
6.4%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Average
5.4%
Exceptional
4.8%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.6%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Tragic
5.9%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
5.6%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.2%
Average
8.7%
Women w/ Children < 6
Good
7.6%
Exceptional
7.3%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
9.2%
Exceptional
8.6%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
5.2%
Exceptional
5.1%

Immigrants from Scotland vs Zimbabwean Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Scotland and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (64.2% compared to 67.3%, a difference of 4.8%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.6% compared to 81.0%, a difference of 1.7%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 86.1%, a difference of 1.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.8% compared to 75.6%, a difference of 0.25%), in labor force | age 16-19 (38.5% compared to 38.7%, a difference of 0.59%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.1% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 0.62%).
Immigrants from Scotland vs Zimbabwean Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from ScotlandZimbabwean
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
64.2%
Exceptional
67.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Average
79.6%
Exceptional
81.0%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
38.5%
Exceptional
38.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
75.8%
Excellent
75.6%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
85.4%
Fair
84.5%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.1%
Exceptional
85.6%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Excellent
84.7%
Exceptional
86.1%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Good
83.0%
Exceptional
84.0%

Immigrants from Scotland vs Zimbabwean Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Scotland and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.5% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 10.5%), single father households (2.1% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 6.4%), and births to unmarried women (30.4% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 5.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.7% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 1.0%), average family size (3.12 compared to 3.20, a difference of 2.4%), and divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 3.6%).
Immigrants from Scotland vs Zimbabwean Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from ScotlandZimbabwean
Family Households
Excellent
64.7%
Fair
64.1%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.8%
Exceptional
27.9%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
49.3%
Excellent
47.4%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.12
Poor
3.20
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.1%
Exceptional
2.2%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.5%
Excellent
6.1%
Currently Married
Exceptional
49.3%
Good
47.0%
Divorced or Separated
Good
12.0%
Exceptional
11.6%
Births to Unmarried Women
Excellent
30.4%
Exceptional
28.7%

Immigrants from Scotland vs Zimbabwean Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Scotland and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.3% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 8.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.7% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 3.4%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (58.9% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 2.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.8% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 0.82%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.8% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 2.7%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (58.9% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 2.9%).
Immigrants from Scotland vs Zimbabwean Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from ScotlandZimbabwean
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.3%
Exceptional
9.0%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
91.8%
Exceptional
91.0%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
58.9%
Exceptional
57.2%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
20.8%
Excellent
20.3%
4+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
6.7%
Good
6.4%

Immigrants from Scotland vs Zimbabwean Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Scotland and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 6.1%), doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 4.8%), and bachelor's degree (42.3% compared to 43.3%, a difference of 2.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.4% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.13%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.13%), and 1st grade (98.4% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.13%).
Immigrants from Scotland vs Zimbabwean Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from ScotlandZimbabwean
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.6%
Exceptional
1.7%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.4%
Exceptional
98.3%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.4%
Exceptional
98.3%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Exceptional
98.3%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.2%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.1%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Exceptional
97.9%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Exceptional
97.8%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Exceptional
97.6%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.1%
Exceptional
96.8%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.8%
Exceptional
96.5%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.1%
Exceptional
95.9%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.2%
Exceptional
94.9%
11th Grade
Exceptional
94.2%
Exceptional
93.9%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
93.0%
Exceptional
92.7%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
91.3%
Exceptional
91.1%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
88.2%
Exceptional
88.0%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
69.4%
Exceptional
69.9%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
63.4%
Exceptional
64.2%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
50.6%
Exceptional
51.3%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
42.3%
Exceptional
43.3%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
17.4%
Exceptional
17.7%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
5.3%
Exceptional
5.2%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.2%
Exceptional
2.3%

Immigrants from Scotland vs Zimbabwean Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Scotland and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.3% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 17.4%), disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 16.5%), and ambulatory disability (6.0% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 12.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.6% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 0.29%), disability age 65 to 74 (21.7% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 0.58%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.7% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 2.8%).
Immigrants from Scotland vs Zimbabwean Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from ScotlandZimbabwean
Disability
Fair
11.8%
Exceptional
10.9%
Males
Tragic
11.6%
Exceptional
10.6%
Females
Good
12.0%
Exceptional
11.3%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.4%
Exceptional
1.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Good
5.6%
Good
5.5%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Poor
6.8%
Good
6.5%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.7%
Exceptional
10.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
21.7%
Exceptional
21.5%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
45.1%
Tragic
48.1%
Vision
Exceptional
2.1%
Exceptional
2.0%
Hearing
Tragic
3.3%
Excellent
2.8%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.2%
Tragic
17.6%
Ambulatory
Good
6.0%
Exceptional
5.4%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.4%
Exceptional
2.2%