Immigrants from Scotland vs Chickasaw Unemployment Among Women with Children Under 6 years

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 161,734,775 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Scotland and unemployment rate among women with children under the age of 6 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.835 and weighted average of 7.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 128,741,531 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and unemployment rate among women with children under the age of 6 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.316 and weighted average of 9.0%, a difference of 18.1%.

Unemployment Among Women with Children Under 6 years Correlation Summary

Measurement	Immigrants from Scotland	Chickasaw
Minimum	3.7%	2.2%
Maximum	100.0%	100.0%
Range	96.3%	97.8%
Mean	21.2%	31.1%
Median	13.1%	16.5%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	6.6%	8.8%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	23.2%	50.0%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	16.6%	41.2%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	25.1%	28.9%
Standard Deviation (Population)	24.7%	28.5%

Similar Demographics by Unemployment Among Women with Children Under 6 years

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Scotland by Unemployment Among Women with Children Under 6 years

In terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Scotland are Immigrants from Canada (7.6%, a difference of 0.020%), Kenyan (7.6%, a difference of 0.080%), Czech (7.6%, a difference of 0.11%), Belgian (7.6%, a difference of 0.15%), and Immigrants from Grenada (7.6%, a difference of 0.16%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Unemployment Among Women with Children Under 6 years
Immigrants \| Lithuania	68.8 /100 \| #162	Good 7.5%
British	66.3 /100 \| #163	Good 7.6%
Ugandans	65.8 /100 \| #164	Good 7.6%
Immigrants \| South America	65.6 /100 \| #165	Good 7.6%
Belgians	63.5 /100 \| #166	Good 7.6%
Kenyans	62.5 /100 \| #167	Good 7.6%
Immigrants \| Canada	61.6 /100 \| #168	Good 7.6%
Immigrants \| Scotland	61.3 /100 \| #169	Good 7.6%
Czechs	59.8 /100 \| #170	Average 7.6%
Immigrants \| Grenada	59.0 /100 \| #171	Average 7.6%
Immigrants \| North America	57.7 /100 \| #172	Average 7.6%
Cree	51.6 /100 \| #173	Average 7.6%
Immigrants \| Laos	50.0 /100 \| #174	Average 7.6%
Panamanians	49.6 /100 \| #175	Average 7.6%
Puget Sound Salish	47.7 /100 \| #176	Average 7.7%

Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Unemployment Among Women with Children Under 6 years

In terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Creek (8.9%, a difference of 0.53%), Immigrants from Jamaica (8.9%, a difference of 0.62%), Tlingit-Haida (8.9%, a difference of 0.83%), Hispanic or Latino (9.0%, a difference of 0.89%), and Immigrants from West Indies (9.0%, a difference of 0.91%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Unemployment Among Women with Children Under 6 years
Immigrants \| Nonimmigrants	0.0 /100 \| #294	Tragic 8.8%
Immigrants \| Central America	0.0 /100 \| #295	Tragic 8.9%
Immigrants \| Dominican Republic	0.0 /100 \| #296	Tragic 8.9%
Mexicans	0.0 /100 \| #297	Tragic 8.9%
Tlingit-Haida	0.0 /100 \| #298	Tragic 8.9%
Immigrants \| Jamaica	0.0 /100 \| #299	Tragic 8.9%
Creek	0.0 /100 \| #300	Tragic 8.9%
Chickasaw	0.0 /100 \| #301	Tragic 9.0%
Hispanics or Latinos	0.0 /100 \| #302	Tragic 9.0%
Immigrants \| West Indies	0.0 /100 \| #303	Tragic 9.0%
Immigrants \| Mexico	0.0 /100 \| #304	Tragic 9.1%
Alaskan Athabascans	0.0 /100 \| #305	Tragic 9.1%
Pueblo	0.0 /100 \| #306	Tragic 9.1%
Dominicans	0.0 /100 \| #307	Tragic 9.1%
Immigrants \| Micronesia	0.0 /100 \| #308	Tragic 9.1%