Immigrants from Scotland vs Nicaraguan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 144,437,684 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Nicaraguans within Immigrant from Scotland communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.253. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Scotland within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.094% in Nicaraguans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Scotland corresponds to an increase of 94.4 Nicaraguans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Scotland and Nicaraguan communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($49,893 compared to $39,372, a difference of 26.7%), median male earnings ($61,220 compared to $49,215, a difference of 24.4%), and median family income ($114,392 compared to $92,231, a difference of 24.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,638 compared to $53,275, a difference of 1.2%), median female earnings ($41,771 compared to $36,904, a difference of 13.2%), and median earnings ($50,741 compared to $43,026, a difference of 17.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Scotland and Nicaraguan communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.0% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 79.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.3% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 61.5%), and married-couple family poverty (4.2% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 61.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (12.7% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 2.3%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.6% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 2.5%), and single father poverty (16.7% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 5.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Scotland and Nicaraguan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 13.3%), female unemployment (4.9% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 10.9%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.2% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 9.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.67%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.4% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 0.73%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Scotland and Nicaraguan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.5% compared to 32.4%, a difference of 18.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.8% compared to 73.2%, a difference of 3.6%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.4% compared to 83.1%, a difference of 2.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (83.0% compared to 82.8%, a difference of 0.27%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.6% compared to 79.3%, a difference of 0.32%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 0.67%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Scotland and Nicaraguan communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.5% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 31.9%), single father households (2.1% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 27.0%), and births to unmarried women (30.4% compared to 36.6%, a difference of 20.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.7% compared to 67.4%, a difference of 4.1%), family households with children (26.8% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 5.8%), and average family size (3.12 compared to 3.36, a difference of 7.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Scotland and Nicaraguan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.3% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 15.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.9% compared to 56.1%, a difference of 5.0%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.7% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 4.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (20.8% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 0.52%), 1 or more vehicles in household (91.8% compared to 90.4%, a difference of 1.5%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.7% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 4.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Scotland and Nicaraguan communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 80.5%), doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 44.5%), and master's degree (17.4% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 39.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.4% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 1.4%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 1.4%), and 1st grade (98.4% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Scotland and Nicaraguan communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.3% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 22.4%), disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 19.3%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.8% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 16.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ambulatory disability (6.0% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 0.55%), female disability (12.0% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 1.6%), and cognitive disability (16.2% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 4.7%).