Immigrants from Scotland vs Immigrants from Congo Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 65,621,170 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Congo within Immigrant from Scotland communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.185. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Scotland within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.159% in Immigrants from Congo. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Scotland corresponds to an increase of 158.9 Immigrants from Congo.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Scotland and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($105,089 compared to $72,178, a difference of 45.6%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($112,175 compared to $77,850, a difference of 44.1%), and median household income ($94,091 compared to $66,768, a difference of 40.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,638 compared to $43,266, a difference of 21.7%), median female earnings ($41,771 compared to $34,317, a difference of 21.7%), and median earnings ($50,741 compared to $39,169, a difference of 29.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Scotland and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 16 (13.7% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 64.0%), child poverty among girls under 16 (14.0% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 62.1%), and family poverty (7.3% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 62.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.7% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 8.5%), single male poverty (12.7% compared to 13.9%, a difference of 9.5%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.5% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 18.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Scotland and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 37.3%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.2% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 15.4%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.6% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 11.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.2% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 2.1%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.8% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 3.6%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.7% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 4.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Scotland and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.5% compared to 41.7%, a difference of 8.3%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.2% compared to 67.1%, a difference of 4.5%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.8% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (79.6% compared to 79.3%, a difference of 0.33%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.1% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.66%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Scotland and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.5% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 47.9%), married-couple households (49.3% compared to 39.0%, a difference of 26.2%), and single father households (2.1% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 21.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.8% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 1.9%), average family size (3.12 compared to 3.23, a difference of 3.4%), and family households (64.7% compared to 59.2%, a difference of 9.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Scotland and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.7% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 26.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.8% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 22.5%), and no vehicles in household (8.3% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 20.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.8% compared to 90.0%, a difference of 1.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.9% compared to 52.1%, a difference of 13.0%), and no vehicles in household (8.3% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 20.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Scotland and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 46.7%), professional degree (5.3% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 44.2%), and master's degree (17.4% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 37.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.4% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.84%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.85%), and 1st grade (98.4% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.86%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Scotland and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 28.2%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.7% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 23.9%), and cognitive disability (16.2% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 21.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 0.97%), male disability (11.6% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 1.1%), and disability (11.8% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 3.3%).