Immigrants from Scotland vs Immigrants from Malaysia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 118,373,372 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Malaysia within Immigrant from Scotland communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.723. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Scotland within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.611% in Immigrants from Malaysia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Scotland corresponds to an increase of 610.8 Immigrants from Malaysia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Scotland and Immigrants from Malaysia communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (28.7% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 9.2%), median female earnings ($41,771 compared to $43,835, a difference of 4.9%), and median earnings ($50,741 compared to $52,514, a difference of 3.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of per capita income ($49,893 compared to $49,983, a difference of 0.18%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($112,175 compared to $112,796, a difference of 0.55%), and median family income ($114,392 compared to $115,880, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Scotland and Immigrants from Malaysia communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 23.9%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.3% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 17.9%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.5% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 16.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single female poverty (19.4% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 0.010%), single mother poverty (27.6% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 1.2%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.2% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Scotland and Immigrants from Malaysia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.6% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 18.7%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 17.6%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.2% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 12.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.33%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.4% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 0.59%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Scotland and Immigrants from Malaysia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.5% compared to 34.3%, a difference of 12.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.8% compared to 73.3%, a difference of 3.4%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.2% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 3.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.1% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.020%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.030%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.0% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 0.24%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Scotland and Immigrants from Malaysia communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (30.4% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 11.1%), divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 9.3%), and currently married (49.3% compared to 47.3%, a difference of 4.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.7% compared to 64.0%, a difference of 1.1%), single father households (2.1% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 1.6%), and single mother households (5.5% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 3.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Scotland and Immigrants from Malaysia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.3% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 63.1%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.8% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 13.7%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.7% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 12.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.8% compared to 86.5%, a difference of 6.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.9% compared to 52.7%, a difference of 11.8%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.7% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 12.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Scotland and Immigrants from Malaysia communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 43.6%), doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 18.3%), and master's degree (17.4% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 8.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, under 1 year (69.4% compared to 69.3%, a difference of 0.12%), nursery school (98.4% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.76%), and kindergarten (98.4% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.77%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Scotland and Immigrants from Malaysia communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 24.9%), hearing disability (3.3% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 21.8%), and male disability (11.6% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 15.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (21.7% compared to 21.4%, a difference of 1.3%), disability age over 75 (45.1% compared to 46.4%, a difference of 2.8%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 3.6%).