Immigrants from Scotland vs Immigrants from Taiwan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 155,256,660 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Taiwan within Immigrant from Scotland communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.023. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Scotland within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.006% in Immigrants from Taiwan. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Scotland corresponds to a decrease of 5.9 Immigrants from Taiwan.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Scotland and Immigrants from Taiwan communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($94,091 compared to $116,460, a difference of 23.8%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($105,089 compared to $129,122, a difference of 22.9%), and median male earnings ($61,220 compared to $74,031, a difference of 20.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (28.7% compared to 29.5%, a difference of 2.5%), householder income under 25 years ($52,638 compared to $59,424, a difference of 12.9%), and householder income over 65 years ($66,620 compared to $77,051, a difference of 15.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Scotland and Immigrants from Taiwan communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (15.2% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 31.0%), child poverty among boys under 16 (14.1% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 27.6%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (13.7% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 24.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (4.2% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 0.53%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.3% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 4.0%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.6% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 7.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Scotland and Immigrants from Taiwan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.2% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 25.9%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.6% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 25.5%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 16.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.2% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 0.15%), unemployment (4.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.22%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.2% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 0.44%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Scotland and Immigrants from Taiwan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.5% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 24.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.8% compared to 71.5%, a difference of 6.0%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.2% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 2.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.1% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 0.20%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 0.20%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.6% compared to 80.0%, a difference of 0.48%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Scotland and Immigrants from Taiwan communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (30.4% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 32.1%), divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 22.2%), and single mother households (5.5% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 17.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (49.3% compared to 50.7%, a difference of 2.8%), average family size (3.12 compared to 3.24, a difference of 3.7%), and family households (64.7% compared to 68.0%, a difference of 5.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Scotland and Immigrants from Taiwan communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.7% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 13.0%), no vehicles in household (8.3% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 8.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.8% compared to 22.1%, a difference of 6.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.8% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 0.57%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.9% compared to 59.7%, a difference of 1.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.8% compared to 22.1%, a difference of 6.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Scotland and Immigrants from Taiwan communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 47.5%), professional degree (5.3% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 34.6%), and no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 29.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (93.0% compared to 92.8%, a difference of 0.26%), high school diploma (91.3% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 0.33%), and nursery school (98.4% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.53%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Scotland and Immigrants from Taiwan communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.7% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 36.8%), disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 1.0%, a difference of 36.2%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.6% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 32.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (45.1% compared to 45.5%, a difference of 0.91%), cognitive disability (16.2% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 3.1%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 7.3%).