Immigrants from Scotland vs Ecuadorian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 155,558,964 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Ecuadorians within Immigrant from Scotland communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.207. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Scotland within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.125% in Ecuadorians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Scotland corresponds to a decrease of 124.6 Ecuadorians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Scotland and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (28.7% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 25.4%), householder income over 65 years ($66,620 compared to $54,958, a difference of 21.2%), and median family income ($114,392 compared to $95,114, a difference of 20.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,638 compared to $53,911, a difference of 2.4%), median female earnings ($41,771 compared to $39,117, a difference of 6.8%), and median earnings ($50,741 compared to $45,214, a difference of 12.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Scotland and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.0% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 65.3%), married-couple family poverty (4.2% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 56.8%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.3% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 50.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.7% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 1.2%), single male poverty (12.7% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 1.4%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.6% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 3.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Scotland and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in female unemployment (4.9% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 27.4%), unemployment (4.9% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 27.2%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.2% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 26.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.6% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 4.2%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 7.5%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.2% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 8.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Scotland and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.5% compared to 31.4%, a difference of 22.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.8% compared to 72.4%, a difference of 4.7%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.2% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 2.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (79.6% compared to 79.4%, a difference of 0.26%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.54%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.1% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 0.83%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Scotland and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.5% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 31.1%), single father households (2.1% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 14.9%), and married-couple households (49.3% compared to 43.5%, a difference of 13.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.7% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 0.40%), divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 2.1%), and family households with children (26.8% compared to 27.8%, a difference of 3.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Scotland and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.3% compared to 22.8%, a difference of 173.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.7% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 49.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.8% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 48.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.8% compared to 77.9%, a difference of 17.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.9% compared to 42.0%, a difference of 40.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.8% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 48.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Scotland and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 81.4%), doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 48.6%), and professional degree (5.3% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 34.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.4% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 1.4%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 1.4%), and 1st grade (98.4% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Scotland and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.3% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 32.9%), disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 25.3%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.8% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 17.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 35 to 64 (10.7% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 0.54%), ambulatory disability (6.0% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 0.70%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.6% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 1.1%).