Immigrants from Scotland vs Puget Sound Salish Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 33,935,066 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Puget Sound Salish within Immigrant from Scotland communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.838. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Scotland within a typical geography, there is an increase of 4.426% in Puget Sound Salish. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Scotland corresponds to an increase of 4,426.2 Puget Sound Salish.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Scotland and Puget Sound Salish communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($49,893 compared to $41,495, a difference of 20.2%), median family income ($114,392 compared to $97,958, a difference of 16.8%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($112,175 compared to $98,340, a difference of 14.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,638 compared to $55,543, a difference of 5.5%), median female earnings ($41,771 compared to $39,376, a difference of 6.1%), and median earnings ($50,741 compared to $46,333, a difference of 9.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Scotland and Puget Sound Salish communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.0% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 45.7%), married-couple family poverty (4.2% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 17.5%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.2% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 16.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (12.7% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 0.83%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.5% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 1.9%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.6% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Scotland and Puget Sound Salish communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.2% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 23.3%), male unemployment (4.9% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 11.4%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.8% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 11.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.52%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.59%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.6% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 0.73%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Scotland and Puget Sound Salish communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 30-34 (85.1% compared to 82.1%, a difference of 3.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.8% compared to 78.0%, a difference of 2.9%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.4% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 2.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.2% compared to 63.7%, a difference of 0.81%), in labor force | age 16-19 (38.5% compared to 39.1%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.0% compared to 81.7%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Scotland and Puget Sound Salish communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.1% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 29.3%), single mother households (5.5% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 14.0%), and divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 11.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (30.4% compared to 30.4%, a difference of 0.13%), family households (64.7% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 1.4%), and average family size (3.12 compared to 3.17, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Scotland and Puget Sound Salish communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.7% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 41.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.8% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 26.8%), and no vehicles in household (8.3% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 14.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.8% compared to 90.5%, a difference of 1.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.9% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 5.4%), and no vehicles in household (8.3% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 14.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Scotland and Puget Sound Salish communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 80.3%), professional degree (5.3% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 70.6%), and master's degree (17.4% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 56.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.17%), 1st grade (98.4% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.17%), and nursery school (98.4% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.18%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Scotland and Puget Sound Salish communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 0.97%, a difference of 41.0%), disability age 65 to 74 (21.7% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 25.3%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.7% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 24.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.2% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 8.3%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.6% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 9.5%), and disability age over 75 (45.1% compared to 49.8%, a difference of 10.4%).