Immigrants from Scotland vs Northern European Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 177,311,647 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Northern Europeans within Immigrant from Scotland communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.541. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Scotland within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.265% in Northern Europeans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Scotland corresponds to an increase of 265.4 Northern Europeans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Scotland and Northern European communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($105,089 compared to $100,457, a difference of 4.6%), per capita income ($49,893 compared to $47,698, a difference of 4.6%), and median male earnings ($61,220 compared to $58,588, a difference of 4.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (28.7% compared to 28.3%, a difference of 1.6%), householder income under 25 years ($52,638 compared to $51,678, a difference of 1.9%), and householder income over 65 years ($66,620 compared to $64,658, a difference of 3.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Scotland and Northern European communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.6% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 11.0%), receiving food stamps (9.0% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 9.3%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.2% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 8.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.3% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 1.3%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.5% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 1.3%), and single father poverty (16.7% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Scotland and Northern European communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.2% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 5.4%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 2.9%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.2% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 2.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.2% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 0.060%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.22%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 0.43%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Scotland and Northern European communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.5% compared to 40.2%, a difference of 4.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.8% compared to 76.8%, a difference of 1.3%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.2% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 0.68%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (79.6% compared to 79.5%, a difference of 0.15%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.0% compared to 82.7%, a difference of 0.30%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.1% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.36%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Scotland and Northern European communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.1% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 8.1%), single mother households (5.5% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 4.9%), and divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.12 compared to 3.13, a difference of 0.15%), births to unmarried women (30.4% compared to 30.6%, a difference of 0.57%), and family households (64.7% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 0.94%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Scotland and Northern European communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.7% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 9.4%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.8% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 5.8%), and no vehicles in household (8.3% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 5.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.8% compared to 92.2%, a difference of 0.48%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.9% compared to 59.9%, a difference of 1.6%), and no vehicles in household (8.3% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 5.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Scotland and Northern European communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (17.4% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 4.2%), no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 3.2%), and bachelor's degree (42.3% compared to 41.0%, a difference of 3.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (95.2% compared to 95.3%, a difference of 0.020%), 11th grade (94.2% compared to 94.2%, a difference of 0.020%), and 9th grade (96.1% compared to 96.2%, a difference of 0.040%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Scotland and Northern European communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 13.2%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.8% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 7.1%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.7% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 6.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ambulatory disability (6.0% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 0.020%), self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 0.66%), and female disability (12.0% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 2.2%).