Immigrants from Scotland vs Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 76,374,936 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs within Immigrant from Scotland communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.394. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Scotland within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.529% in Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Scotland corresponds to an increase of 529.4 Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Scotland and Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($52,638 compared to $65,329, a difference of 24.1%), per capita income ($49,893 compared to $45,195, a difference of 10.4%), and wage/income gap (28.7% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 7.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($112,175 compared to $110,201, a difference of 1.8%), median household income ($94,091 compared to $91,991, a difference of 2.3%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($105,089 compared to $101,936, a difference of 3.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Scotland and Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (16.7% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 42.4%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.6% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 35.4%), and single male poverty (12.7% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 29.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family poverty (7.3% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 0.56%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.5% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 1.5%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.3% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 3.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Scotland and Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.2% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 28.0%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 19.6%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.6% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 17.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.38%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.48%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.6% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Scotland and Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 30-34 (85.1% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 2.3%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.4% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.90%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 0.78%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.8% compared to 75.9%, a difference of 0.080%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.6% compared to 79.4%, a difference of 0.16%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.0% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 0.25%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Scotland and Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (30.4% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 38.3%), single mother households (5.5% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 14.1%), and divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 13.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (49.3% compared to 50.8%, a difference of 2.9%), average family size (3.12 compared to 3.24, a difference of 3.8%), and family households with children (26.8% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 4.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Scotland and Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.3% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 19.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.7% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 7.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.8% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 4.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.8% compared to 93.0%, a difference of 1.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.9% compared to 60.5%, a difference of 2.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.8% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 4.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Scotland and Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 50.5%), doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 31.2%), and professional degree (5.3% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 16.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.4% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.90%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.90%), and 1st grade (98.4% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.91%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Scotland and Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 25.3%), self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 19.9%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.8% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 12.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.2% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 0.040%), hearing disability (3.3% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 0.34%), and disability (11.8% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 1.1%).