Immigrants from Scotland vs Immigrants from Ecuador Community Comparison
COMPARE
Immigrants from Scotland
Immigrants from Ecuador
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Immigrants from Scotland
Immigrants from Ecuador
9,011
SOCIAL INDEX
87.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
36th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,063
SOCIAL INDEX
18.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
272nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Immigrants from Ecuador Integration in Immigrants from Scotland Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 140,052,287 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Ecuador within Immigrant from Scotland communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.211. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Scotland within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.375% in Immigrants from Ecuador. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Scotland corresponds to an increase of 374.7 Immigrants from Ecuador.
Immigrants from Scotland vs Immigrants from Ecuador Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Scotland and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (28.7% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 27.8%), householder income over 65 years ($66,620 compared to $54,030, a difference of 23.3%), and median family income ($114,392 compared to $92,837, a difference of 23.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,638 compared to $53,722, a difference of 2.1%), median female earnings ($41,771 compared to $38,644, a difference of 8.1%), and median earnings ($50,741 compared to $44,462, a difference of 14.1%).
Income Metric | Immigrants from Scotland | Immigrants from Ecuador |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $49,893 | Tragic $41,195 |
Median Family Income | Exceptional $114,392 | Tragic $92,837 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $94,091 | Tragic $80,341 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $50,741 | Tragic $44,462 |
Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $61,220 | Tragic $50,474 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $41,771 | Poor $38,644 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Good $52,638 | Exceptional $53,722 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $105,089 | Tragic $89,673 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $112,175 | Tragic $91,462 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $66,620 | Tragic $54,030 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 28.7% | Exceptional 22.5% |
Immigrants from Scotland vs Immigrants from Ecuador Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Scotland and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.0% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 67.2%), married-couple family poverty (4.2% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 62.6%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.3% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 55.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (12.7% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 0.97%), single father poverty (16.7% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 2.5%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.6% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 3.3%).
Poverty Metric | Immigrants from Scotland | Immigrants from Ecuador |
Poverty | Exceptional 10.6% | Tragic 14.3% |
Families | Exceptional 7.3% | Tragic 11.1% |
Males | Exceptional 9.6% | Tragic 12.9% |
Females | Exceptional 11.5% | Tragic 15.6% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Exceptional 18.6% | Exceptional 19.2% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 12.2% | Tragic 14.6% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 15.2% | Tragic 19.6% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 13.7% | Tragic 19.4% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.1% | Tragic 19.8% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.0% | Tragic 19.3% |
Single Males | Good 12.7% | Excellent 12.5% |
Single Females | Exceptional 19.4% | Tragic 22.0% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 16.7% | Average 16.3% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 27.6% | Tragic 31.3% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 4.2% | Tragic 6.7% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 9.3% | Tragic 14.4% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 10.5% | Tragic 16.1% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 9.0% | Tragic 15.0% |
Immigrants from Scotland vs Immigrants from Ecuador Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Scotland and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in female unemployment (4.9% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 29.2%), unemployment (4.9% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 28.5%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.2% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 28.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.6% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 3.7%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 8.1%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.2% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 10.3%).
Unemployment Metric | Immigrants from Scotland | Immigrants from Ecuador |
Unemployment | Exceptional 4.9% | Tragic 6.2% |
Males | Exceptional 4.9% | Tragic 6.2% |
Females | Exceptional 4.9% | Tragic 6.4% |
Youth < 25 | Excellent 11.4% | Tragic 13.4% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.8% | Tragic 20.9% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Good 10.2% | Tragic 11.8% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Fair 6.7% | Tragic 7.4% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Average 5.4% | Tragic 6.3% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Tragic 5.4% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Tragic 5.3% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Tragic 5.7% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.6% | Tragic 5.8% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 5.2% | Tragic 5.8% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 5.0% | Tragic 5.6% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 9.2% | Excellent 8.5% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Good 7.6% | Poor 7.9% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 9.2% | Tragic 10.2% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 5.2% | Tragic 6.6% |
Immigrants from Scotland vs Immigrants from Ecuador Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Scotland and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.5% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 24.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.8% compared to 72.3%, a difference of 4.9%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.2% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 2.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (79.6% compared to 79.3%, a difference of 0.34%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 0.63%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.1% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.97%).
Labor Participation Metric | Immigrants from Scotland | Immigrants from Ecuador |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 64.2% | Exceptional 65.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Average 79.6% | Poor 79.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.5% | Tragic 31.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 75.8% | Tragic 72.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Exceptional 85.4% | Tragic 84.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 85.1% | Tragic 84.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Excellent 84.7% | Poor 84.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Good 83.0% | Tragic 82.2% |
Immigrants from Scotland vs Immigrants from Ecuador Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Scotland and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.5% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 33.7%), single father households (2.1% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 16.2%), and married-couple households (49.3% compared to 42.9%, a difference of 14.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.7% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 0.17%), divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 1.3%), and family households with children (26.8% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 3.3%).
Family Structure Metric | Immigrants from Scotland | Immigrants from Ecuador |
Family Households | Excellent 64.7% | Exceptional 64.8% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 26.8% | Excellent 27.7% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 49.3% | Tragic 42.9% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.12 | Exceptional 3.32 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.1% | Poor 2.4% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.5% | Tragic 7.3% |
Currently Married | Exceptional 49.3% | Tragic 43.2% |
Divorced or Separated | Good 12.0% | Excellent 11.8% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Excellent 30.4% | Tragic 33.7% |
Immigrants from Scotland vs Immigrants from Ecuador Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Scotland and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.3% compared to 23.8%, a difference of 186.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.7% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 57.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.8% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 55.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.8% compared to 76.2%, a difference of 20.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.9% compared to 40.5%, a difference of 45.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.8% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 55.2%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Immigrants from Scotland | Immigrants from Ecuador |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 8.3% | Tragic 23.8% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 91.8% | Tragic 76.2% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 58.9% | Tragic 40.5% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 20.8% | Tragic 13.4% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Excellent 6.7% | Tragic 4.2% |
Immigrants from Scotland vs Immigrants from Ecuador Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Scotland and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 89.3%), doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 53.9%), and professional degree (5.3% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 38.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.4% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.5%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.6%), and 1st grade (98.4% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.6%).
Education Level Metric | Immigrants from Scotland | Immigrants from Ecuador |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.6% | Tragic 3.1% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.4% | Tragic 96.9% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.4% | Tragic 96.9% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Tragic 96.9% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Tragic 96.8% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Tragic 96.6% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Tragic 96.2% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Tragic 95.8% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.8% | Tragic 95.3% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 97.1% | Tragic 93.7% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.8% | Tragic 93.3% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 96.1% | Tragic 91.8% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 95.2% | Tragic 90.4% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 94.2% | Tragic 89.1% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 93.0% | Tragic 87.5% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 91.3% | Tragic 84.8% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 88.2% | Tragic 81.0% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 69.4% | Tragic 58.7% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 63.4% | Tragic 53.4% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 50.6% | Tragic 42.2% |
Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 42.3% | Tragic 34.7% |
Master's Degree | Exceptional 17.4% | Tragic 13.6% |
Professional Degree | Exceptional 5.3% | Tragic 3.8% |
Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 2.2% | Tragic 1.4% |
Immigrants from Scotland vs Immigrants from Ecuador Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Scotland and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.3% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 34.8%), disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 22.4%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.8% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 18.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 35 to 64 (10.7% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 0.35%), female disability (12.0% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 1.0%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.6% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 1.0%).
Disability Metric | Immigrants from Scotland | Immigrants from Ecuador |
Disability | Fair 11.8% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Males | Tragic 11.6% | Exceptional 10.4% |
Females | Good 12.0% | Exceptional 11.9% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.4% | Exceptional 1.1% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Good 5.6% | Good 5.5% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Poor 6.8% | Exceptional 5.7% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 10.7% | Exceptional 10.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 21.7% | Fair 23.7% |
Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 45.1% | Average 47.4% |
Vision | Exceptional 2.1% | Tragic 2.3% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.3% | Exceptional 2.5% |
Cognitive | Exceptional 16.2% | Good 17.2% |
Ambulatory | Good 6.0% | Average 6.1% |
Self-Care | Exceptional 2.4% | Tragic 2.6% |