Chinese vs Panamanian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 55,496,716 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Panamanians within Chinese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.500. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chinese within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.109% in Panamanians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chinese corresponds to a decrease of 109.1 Panamanians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chinese and Panamanian communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($77,465 compared to $58,266, a difference of 33.0%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($116,156 compared to $96,066, a difference of 20.9%), and median household income ($98,496 compared to $82,272, a difference of 19.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($41,461 compared to $39,049, a difference of 6.2%), wage/income gap (25.9% compared to 24.4%, a difference of 6.3%), and median earnings ($48,836 compared to $45,593, a difference of 7.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chinese and Panamanian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (3.6% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 52.6%), family poverty (6.5% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 51.2%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (11.9% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 49.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.4% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 6.6%), single male poverty (11.0% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 17.3%), and single mother poverty (24.6% compared to 29.6%, a difference of 20.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chinese and Panamanian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (5.9% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 54.2%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 23.0%), and female unemployment (4.5% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 22.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.3% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 0.16%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.4% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 7.6%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.8% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 12.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chinese and Panamanian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.6% compared to 36.1%, a difference of 6.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.3% compared to 74.7%, a difference of 3.4%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (84.1% compared to 82.2%, a difference of 2.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.3% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.21%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.95%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 65.3%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chinese and Panamanian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.2% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 37.9%), single father households (2.0% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 20.4%), and births to unmarried women (30.2% compared to 34.2%, a difference of 13.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.34 compared to 3.25, a difference of 2.7%), family households (68.1% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 5.1%), and family households with children (26.0% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 8.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Panamanian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 52.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 46.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 27.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.9% compared to 87.5%, a difference of 4.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.1% compared to 53.5%, a difference of 12.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 27.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chinese and Panamanian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 42.9%), professional degree (4.5% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 7.8%), and associate's degree (48.5% compared to 45.1%, a difference of 7.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.6% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.64%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.66%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.66%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Panamanian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (4.7% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 26.9%), hearing disability (3.7% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 22.5%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.3% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 15.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (12.3% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 0.56%), self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 0.96%), and disability (12.2% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 1.1%).