Chippewa vs Panamanian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 140,279,015 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Panamanians within Chippewa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.302. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chippewa within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.032% in Panamanians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chippewa corresponds to an increase of 31.9 Panamanians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Panamanian communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($70,539 compared to $82,272, a difference of 16.6%), per capita income ($36,631 compared to $42,035, a difference of 14.7%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($83,943 compared to $96,066, a difference of 14.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.0% compared to 24.4%, a difference of 2.5%), householder income over 65 years ($53,847 compared to $58,266, a difference of 8.2%), and householder income under 25 years ($47,015 compared to $51,611, a difference of 9.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Panamanian communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (25.9% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 31.7%), child poverty under the age of 5 (23.4% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 28.4%), and single male poverty (16.4% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 27.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.1% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 1.9%), married-couple family poverty (5.4% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 2.3%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.1% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Panamanian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (13.3% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 74.3%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (7.8% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 34.9%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (6.2% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 25.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 3.0%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.0% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 4.2%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 4.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Panamanian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.8% compared to 36.1%, a difference of 21.2%), in labor force | age > 16 (63.1% compared to 65.3%, a difference of 3.5%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (77.1% compared to 74.7%, a difference of 3.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (81.3% compared to 82.2%, a difference of 1.1%), in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 1.3%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (82.9% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Panamanian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.1% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 30.2%), births to unmarried women (42.6% compared to 34.2%, a difference of 24.6%), and single mother households (8.0% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 12.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.20 compared to 3.25, a difference of 1.6%), divorced or separated (13.2% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 4.1%), and family households (62.1% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 4.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Panamanian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 32.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 25.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 14.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.7% compared to 87.5%, a difference of 3.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 53.5%, a difference of 6.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 14.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Panamanian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 28.7%), master's degree (11.4% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 26.1%), and bachelor's degree (30.6% compared to 36.5%, a difference of 19.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (85.2% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.19%), nursery school (98.5% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.60%), and kindergarten (98.5% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.61%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Panamanian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 43.3%), hearing disability (4.0% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 33.0%), and disability age 18 to 34 (9.0% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 32.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.4% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 1.2%), cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 1.9%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 3.9%).