Tsimshian vs Panamanian Community Comparison
COMPARE
Tsimshian
Panamanian
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Tsimshian
Panamanians
4,927
SOCIAL INDEX
46.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
189th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,119
SOCIAL INDEX
18.7/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
268th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Panamanian Integration in Tsimshian Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 12,782,131 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Panamanians within Tsimshian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.037. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Tsimshian within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.012% in Panamanians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Tsimshian corresponds to a decrease of 12.5 Panamanians.
Tsimshian vs Panamanian Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Panamanian communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($97,809 compared to $90,193, a difference of 8.4%), median male earnings ($48,836 compared to $52,835, a difference of 8.2%), and householder income under 25 years ($54,649 compared to $51,611, a difference of 5.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($58,202 compared to $58,266, a difference of 0.11%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($96,783 compared to $96,066, a difference of 0.75%), and median female earnings ($39,530 compared to $39,049, a difference of 1.2%).
Income Metric | Tsimshian | Panamanian |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $40,344 | Poor $42,035 |
Median Family Income | Fair $101,543 | Tragic $97,683 |
Median Household Income | Fair $83,346 | Poor $82,272 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $43,695 | Fair $45,593 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $48,836 | Poor $52,835 |
Median Female Earnings | Average $39,530 | Fair $39,049 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $54,649 | Poor $51,611 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Excellent $97,809 | Tragic $90,193 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Poor $96,783 | Poor $96,066 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $58,202 | Tragic $58,266 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 23.9% | Exceptional 24.4% |
Tsimshian vs Panamanian Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Panamanian communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among girls under 16 (11.5% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 53.2%), single father poverty (12.7% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 29.3%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (14.1% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 24.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of poverty (13.0% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 0.82%), married-couple family poverty (5.9% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 5.9%), and male poverty (12.8% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 7.3%).
Poverty Metric | Tsimshian | Panamanian |
Poverty | Tragic 13.0% | Tragic 13.1% |
Families | Good 8.8% | Tragic 9.8% |
Males | Tragic 12.8% | Tragic 11.9% |
Females | Good 13.1% | Tragic 14.2% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 21.2% | Excellent 19.7% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 12.7% | Tragic 14.2% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 14.7% | Tragic 18.2% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.1% | Tragic 17.5% |
Boys Under 16 years | Average 16.4% | Tragic 17.7% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 11.5% | Tragic 17.6% |
Single Males | Exceptional 11.1% | Fair 12.9% |
Single Females | Exceptional 19.1% | Tragic 21.7% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 12.7% | Fair 16.4% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 26.8% | Fair 29.6% |
Married Couples | Tragic 5.9% | Tragic 5.6% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Good 10.8% | Tragic 11.9% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 16.1% | Tragic 13.4% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 15.7% | Tragic 13.1% |
Tsimshian vs Panamanian Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Panamanian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (13.8% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 139.4%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (18.0% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 65.2%), and male unemployment (8.5% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 51.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.6% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 0.82%), female unemployment (5.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 2.6%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.5% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 3.8%).
Unemployment Metric | Tsimshian | Panamanian |
Unemployment | Tragic 7.2% | Tragic 5.5% |
Males | Tragic 8.5% | Tragic 5.6% |
Females | Fair 5.4% | Tragic 5.5% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 16.5% | Tragic 12.4% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Good 17.3% | Tragic 18.7% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 18.0% | Tragic 10.9% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 8.0% | Tragic 7.0% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 13.8% | Tragic 5.8% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 6.2% | Tragic 5.0% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Good 4.5% | Poor 4.6% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.2% | Excellent 4.7% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Excellent 4.8% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 4.6% | Average 5.4% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.5% | Average 5.2% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 10.5% | Tragic 9.1% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 6.6% | Average 7.6% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 11.4% | Tragic 9.3% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Poor 5.6% | Poor 5.7% |
Tsimshian vs Panamanian Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Panamanian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (77.4% compared to 82.2%, a difference of 6.1%), in labor force | age 25-29 (88.7% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 5.3%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (72.3% compared to 74.7%, a difference of 3.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (83.5% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 0.52%), in labor force | age 20-64 (78.7% compared to 79.1%, a difference of 0.56%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.5% compared to 65.3%, a difference of 1.3%).
Labor Participation Metric | Tsimshian | Panamanian |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 64.5% | Good 65.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 78.7% | Tragic 79.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Excellent 37.4% | Fair 36.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 72.3% | Fair 74.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Exceptional 88.7% | Tragic 84.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 85.8% | Tragic 84.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 83.5% | Tragic 84.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 77.4% | Tragic 82.2% |
Tsimshian vs Panamanian Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Panamanian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (42.2% compared to 34.2%, a difference of 23.2%), single father households (2.9% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 21.7%), and single mother households (6.0% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 18.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.25 compared to 3.25, a difference of 0.13%), family households (67.1% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 3.5%), and family households with children (27.0% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 4.2%).
Family Structure Metric | Tsimshian | Panamanian |
Family Households | Exceptional 67.1% | Exceptional 64.8% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 27.0% | Exceptional 28.2% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 48.7% | Tragic 45.2% |
Average Family Size | Excellent 3.25 | Excellent 3.25 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.9% | Fair 2.4% |
Single Mother Households | Excellent 6.0% | Tragic 7.1% |
Currently Married | Exceptional 47.7% | Tragic 45.3% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 13.3% | Tragic 12.7% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 42.2% | Tragic 34.2% |
Tsimshian vs Panamanian Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Panamanian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.6% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 46.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.7% compared to 53.5%, a difference of 5.9%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 87.5%, a difference of 4.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 1.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 1.9%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 87.5%, a difference of 4.4%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Tsimshian | Panamanian |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 8.6% | Tragic 12.5% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 91.4% | Tragic 87.5% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 56.7% | Tragic 53.5% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Fair 19.1% | Poor 18.8% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Fair 6.2% | Poor 6.0% |
Tsimshian vs Panamanian Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Panamanian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.2% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 30.2%), no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 27.0%), and bachelor's degree (28.8% compared to 36.5%, a difference of 26.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, under 1 year (64.3% compared to 64.3%, a difference of 0.070%), college, 1 year or more (57.9% compared to 58.3%, a difference of 0.58%), and nursery school (98.9% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.95%).
Education Level Metric | Tsimshian | Panamanian |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.7% | Average 2.1% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.9% | Fair 97.9% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.8% | Fair 97.9% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.8% | Fair 97.9% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.8% | Fair 97.8% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.8% | Fair 97.7% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.6% | Fair 97.4% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Fair 97.3% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Fair 96.9% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 97.8% | Fair 95.9% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 99.0% | Fair 95.6% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 97.0% | Fair 94.7% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 95.6% | Fair 93.5% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 94.4% | Fair 92.3% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 92.9% | Fair 90.8% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 91.3% | Poor 88.6% |
GED/Equivalency | Excellent 86.6% | Poor 85.0% |
College, Under 1 year | Poor 64.3% | Poor 64.3% |
College, 1 year or more | Poor 57.9% | Poor 58.3% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 38.6% | Poor 45.1% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 28.8% | Poor 36.5% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 11.4% | Fair 14.4% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.2% | Poor 4.1% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.4% | Tragic 1.7% |
Tsimshian vs Panamanian Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Panamanian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (2.4% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 83.6%), hearing disability (4.7% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 56.6%), and disability age 35 to 64 (16.7% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 40.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.3% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 2.7%), self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 3.5%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.4% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 8.8%).
Disability Metric | Tsimshian | Panamanian |
Disability | Tragic 16.1% | Tragic 12.1% |
Males | Tragic 15.6% | Tragic 11.7% |
Females | Tragic 16.8% | Poor 12.4% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 2.4% | Tragic 1.3% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 7.9% | Tragic 6.0% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.4% | Poor 6.8% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 16.7% | Tragic 11.9% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 32.9% | Tragic 24.4% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 59.2% | Poor 47.9% |
Vision | Tragic 3.2% | Tragic 2.3% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.7% | Average 3.0% |
Cognitive | Average 17.3% | Tragic 17.8% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 8.8% | Tragic 6.4% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.6% | Tragic 2.5% |