Costa Rican vs Immigrants from Taiwan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 190,533,810 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Taiwan within Costa Rican communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.236. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Costa Ricans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.014% in Immigrants from Taiwan. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Costa Ricans corresponds to an increase of 14.2 Immigrants from Taiwan.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Costa Rican and Immigrants from Taiwan communities in the United States are seen in median male earnings ($54,279 compared to $74,031, a difference of 36.4%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($95,565 compared to $129,122, a difference of 35.1%), and median household income ($87,262 compared to $116,460, a difference of 33.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,106 compared to $59,424, a difference of 11.9%), wage/income gap (25.3% compared to 29.5%, a difference of 16.5%), and median female earnings ($39,622 compared to $49,256, a difference of 24.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Costa Rican and Immigrants from Taiwan communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (11.6% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 58.8%), child poverty among boys under 16 (16.1% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 45.9%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (16.9% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 45.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.8% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 8.9%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.8% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 12.5%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.3% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 17.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Costa Rican and Immigrants from Taiwan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.8% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 29.7%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.8% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 20.7%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.5% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 17.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.5% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 2.9%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 4.1%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.1% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 4.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Costa Rican and Immigrants from Taiwan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.3% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 17.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.2% compared to 71.5%, a difference of 5.2%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.6% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 0.86%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.6% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 0.090%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.3% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 0.25%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.7% compared to 80.0%, a difference of 0.31%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Costa Rican and Immigrants from Taiwan communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (32.7% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 42.1%), single mother households (6.5% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 38.9%), and single father households (2.3% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 27.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.26 compared to 3.24, a difference of 0.51%), family households with children (28.4% compared to 29.0%, a difference of 2.4%), and family households (65.9% compared to 68.0%, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Costa Rican and Immigrants from Taiwan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.5% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 23.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 10.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.6% compared to 22.1%, a difference of 7.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.5% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 1.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.9% compared to 59.7%, a difference of 4.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.6% compared to 22.1%, a difference of 7.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Costa Rican and Immigrants from Taiwan communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 73.0%), professional degree (4.5% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 58.2%), and master's degree (15.0% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 50.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.8% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.090%), kindergarten (97.8% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.090%), and 1st grade (97.8% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.090%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Costa Rican and Immigrants from Taiwan communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 1.0%, a difference of 39.4%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.7% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 36.7%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.6% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 33.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.9% compared to 45.5%, a difference of 3.0%), cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 8.4%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 9.5%).