White/Caucasian vs Immigrants from Taiwan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 297,320,977 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Taiwan within White/Caucasian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.400. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Whites/Caucasians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.004% in Immigrants from Taiwan. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Whites/Caucasians corresponds to a decrease of 4.1 Immigrants from Taiwan.

When considering income, the most significant differences between White/Caucasian and Immigrants from Taiwan communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($82,029 compared to $116,460, a difference of 42.0%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($91,668 compared to $129,122, a difference of 40.9%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($98,091 compared to $135,508, a difference of 38.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (28.5% compared to 29.5%, a difference of 3.3%), householder income under 25 years ($50,336 compared to $59,424, a difference of 18.1%), and householder income over 65 years ($58,847 compared to $77,051, a difference of 30.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between White/Caucasian and Immigrants from Taiwan communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (18.1% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 56.3%), receiving food stamps (11.1% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 51.3%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (16.5% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 49.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.4% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 0.70%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.0% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 4.0%), and married-couple family poverty (4.8% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 16.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between White/Caucasian and Immigrants from Taiwan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.4% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 38.3%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.6% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 31.5%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.1% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 26.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment (4.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.42%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.2% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 0.50%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.1% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 0.95%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between White/Caucasian and Immigrants from Taiwan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (41.3% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 33.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.9% compared to 71.5%, a difference of 7.6%), and in labor force | age > 16 (63.6% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 3.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.2% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.64%), in labor force | age 35-44 (83.6% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 1.0%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (83.9% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between White/Caucasian and Immigrants from Taiwan communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (33.3% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 44.5%), single mother households (6.1% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 30.4%), and single father households (2.4% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 30.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.14 compared to 3.24, a difference of 3.0%), currently married (48.6% compared to 50.7%, a difference of 4.4%), and family households (65.1% compared to 68.0%, a difference of 4.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between White/Caucasian and Immigrants from Taiwan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 9.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 2.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.6% compared to 22.1%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (93.1% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 0.89%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.8% compared to 59.7%, a difference of 1.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.6% compared to 22.1%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between White/Caucasian and Immigrants from Taiwan communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 82.0%), professional degree (4.1% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 73.5%), and master's degree (13.8% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 62.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (94.7% compared to 94.4%, a difference of 0.31%), 11th grade (93.3% compared to 93.6%, a difference of 0.32%), and nursery school (98.5% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.54%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between White/Caucasian and Immigrants from Taiwan communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.0%, a difference of 65.0%), disability age 35 to 64 (12.6% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 60.8%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.2% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 47.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.3% compared to 45.5%, a difference of 4.0%), cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 8.0%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 15.5%).