Immigrants from Portugal vs Immigrants from Taiwan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 138,000,800 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Taiwan within Immigrant from Portugal communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.087. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Portugal within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.005% in Immigrants from Taiwan. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Portugal corresponds to a decrease of 5.5 Immigrants from Taiwan.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Portugal and Immigrants from Taiwan communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($55,924 compared to $77,051, a difference of 37.8%), median household income ($84,740 compared to $116,460, a difference of 37.4%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($99,203 compared to $135,508, a difference of 36.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($54,105 compared to $59,424, a difference of 9.8%), wage/income gap (26.7% compared to 29.5%, a difference of 10.3%), and median female earnings ($39,788 compared to $49,256, a difference of 23.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Portugal and Immigrants from Taiwan communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (14.3% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 95.1%), child poverty among boys under 16 (17.4% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 57.6%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (17.8% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 53.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (16.5% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 4.3%), single father poverty (15.9% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 16.2%), and married-couple family poverty (5.0% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 20.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Portugal and Immigrants from Taiwan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.3% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 37.1%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.4% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 34.3%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.3% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 34.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.4% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 1.8%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (12.0% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 6.3%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.5% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 7.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Portugal and Immigrants from Taiwan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.7% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 27.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.8% compared to 71.5%, a difference of 6.1%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.0% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 1.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.4% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 0.11%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.6% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.21%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.0% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 0.82%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Portugal and Immigrants from Taiwan communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (36.2% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 57.2%), single mother households (7.2% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 53.5%), and single father households (2.6% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 43.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.18 compared to 3.24, a difference of 1.8%), family households (65.2% compared to 68.0%, a difference of 4.3%), and family households with children (27.7% compared to 29.0%, a difference of 4.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Portugal and Immigrants from Taiwan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.7% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 52.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 22.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.6% compared to 22.1%, a difference of 18.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.3% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 4.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.8% compared to 59.7%, a difference of 13.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.6% compared to 22.1%, a difference of 18.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Portugal and Immigrants from Taiwan communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 111.5%), professional degree (3.5% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 99.4%), and master's degree (12.6% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 77.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (97.3% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.57%), 1st grade (97.3% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.57%), and nursery school (97.4% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.58%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Portugal and Immigrants from Taiwan communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.8% compared to 1.0%, a difference of 78.3%), disability age 35 to 64 (12.5% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 59.5%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.4% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 53.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.6% compared to 45.5%, a difference of 4.6%), cognitive disability (17.2% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 9.6%), and hearing disability (3.2% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 22.0%).