Immigrants from Poland vs Immigrants from Taiwan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 219,881,412 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Taiwan within Immigrant from Poland communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.280. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Poland within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.005% in Immigrants from Taiwan. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Poland corresponds to a decrease of 5.4 Immigrants from Taiwan.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Poland and Immigrants from Taiwan communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($90,549 compared to $116,460, a difference of 28.6%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($101,065 compared to $129,122, a difference of 27.8%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($106,319 compared to $135,508, a difference of 27.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($55,474 compared to $59,424, a difference of 7.1%), wage/income gap (26.7% compared to 29.5%, a difference of 10.2%), and median female earnings ($41,630 compared to $49,256, a difference of 18.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Poland and Immigrants from Taiwan communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (10.6% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 45.2%), child poverty among boys under 16 (14.7% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 32.9%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (15.1% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 30.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (17.1% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 0.93%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 1.8%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.1% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 4.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Poland and Immigrants from Taiwan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.8% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 28.5%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.8% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 19.6%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.5% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 18.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.7% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 1.1%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.3% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 1.6%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.6% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 3.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Poland and Immigrants from Taiwan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.3% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 20.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.1% compared to 71.5%, a difference of 6.4%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.6% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.99%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (83.6% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 0.15%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.5% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 0.23%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.8% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 0.46%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Poland and Immigrants from Taiwan communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (28.9% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 25.6%), single mother households (5.8% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 22.8%), and divorced or separated (11.2% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 14.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.20 compared to 3.24, a difference of 1.1%), family households (65.2% compared to 68.0%, a difference of 4.3%), and currently married (48.1% compared to 50.7%, a difference of 5.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Poland and Immigrants from Taiwan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.6% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 37.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 29.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.6% compared to 22.1%, a difference of 19.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.5% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 3.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.6% compared to 59.7%, a difference of 9.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.6% compared to 22.1%, a difference of 19.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Poland and Immigrants from Taiwan communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.7% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 91.6%), professional degree (4.3% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 65.8%), and master's degree (15.4% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 46.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 6th grade (97.1% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 0.010%), 7th grade (96.1% compared to 96.1%, a difference of 0.020%), and nursery school (98.0% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.040%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Poland and Immigrants from Taiwan communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.0% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 27.4%), disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.0%, a difference of 26.7%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.1% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 22.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (45.4% compared to 45.5%, a difference of 0.32%), cognitive disability (16.1% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 2.7%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 7.1%).