Immigrants from Ghana vs Immigrants from Sweden Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 97,419,605 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Sweden within Immigrant from Ghana communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.515. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Ghana within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.099% in Immigrants from Sweden. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Ghana corresponds to an increase of 98.9 Immigrants from Sweden.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ghana and Immigrants from Sweden communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($41,131 compared to $55,582, a difference of 35.1%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($87,760 compared to $112,010, a difference of 27.6%), and median family income ($96,544 compared to $122,765, a difference of 27.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,333 compared to $53,621, a difference of 4.5%), median female earnings ($39,894 compared to $44,774, a difference of 12.2%), and householder income over 65 years ($58,624 compared to $69,722, a difference of 18.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ghana and Immigrants from Sweden communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (14.1% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 52.1%), family poverty (10.8% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 40.6%), and married-couple family poverty (5.9% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 35.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.5% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 0.99%), single mother poverty (29.9% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 8.7%), and single male poverty (13.4% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 9.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ghana and Immigrants from Sweden communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.3% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 26.8%), male unemployment (6.2% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 22.7%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 22.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.1% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 4.7%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.6% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 10.2%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 11.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ghana and Immigrants from Sweden communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (67.1% compared to 65.2%, a difference of 2.9%), in labor force | age 16-19 (35.4% compared to 35.9%, a difference of 1.4%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 0.79%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (82.9% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 0.030%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.12%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.0% compared to 79.8%, a difference of 0.31%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ghana and Immigrants from Sweden communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (8.0% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 48.9%), births to unmarried women (34.5% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 20.9%), and single father households (2.4% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 17.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.4% compared to 62.5%, a difference of 1.5%), average family size (3.29 compared to 3.14, a difference of 4.8%), and divorced or separated (12.2% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 5.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ghana and Immigrants from Sweden communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (16.6% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 53.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 19.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (16.2% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 18.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (83.4% compared to 89.3%, a difference of 7.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (47.4% compared to 55.2%, a difference of 16.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (16.2% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 18.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ghana and Immigrants from Sweden communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.1% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 64.8%), doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 62.4%), and no schooling completed (2.6% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 49.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.4% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.93%), kindergarten (97.4% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.94%), and 1st grade (97.4% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.94%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ghana and Immigrants from Sweden communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (11.8% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 19.3%), hearing disability (2.6% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 17.4%), and disability age 65 to 74 (24.5% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 16.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male disability (10.9% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 2.0%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.6% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 4.2%), and disability (11.6% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 5.6%).