Immigrants from Croatia vs Immigrants from Sweden Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 80,785,085 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Sweden within Immigrant from Croatia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.181. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Croatia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.127% in Immigrants from Sweden. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Croatia corresponds to an increase of 126.8 Immigrants from Sweden.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Croatia and Immigrants from Sweden communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($63,168 compared to $69,722, a difference of 10.4%), per capita income ($50,417 compared to $55,582, a difference of 10.2%), and median family income ($112,323 compared to $122,765, a difference of 9.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($54,343 compared to $53,621, a difference of 1.3%), median female earnings ($43,258 compared to $44,774, a difference of 3.5%), and median earnings ($51,581 compared to $54,478, a difference of 5.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Croatia and Immigrants from Sweden communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (17.9% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 15.8%), single father poverty (16.6% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 9.3%), and receiving food stamps (10.0% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 7.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.5% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 0.69%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.3% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 1.6%), and family poverty (7.8% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Croatia and Immigrants from Sweden communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.9% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 10.9%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.3% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 9.9%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.3% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 8.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.82%), female unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 1.7%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.3% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Croatia and Immigrants from Sweden communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-24 (75.1% compared to 74.2%, a difference of 1.1%), in labor force | age 16-19 (36.1% compared to 35.9%, a difference of 0.63%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (86.1% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 0.59%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (85.2% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 0.25%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.0% compared to 65.2%, a difference of 0.29%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.1% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.37%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Croatia and Immigrants from Sweden communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 6.1%), births to unmarried women (29.8% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 4.4%), and family households with children (25.7% compared to 26.5%, a difference of 3.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.14 compared to 3.14, a difference of 0.070%), divorced or separated (11.6% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 0.21%), and currently married (47.5% compared to 47.8%, a difference of 0.67%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Croatia and Immigrants from Sweden communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (13.0% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 20.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.4% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 15.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.2% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 11.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (87.0% compared to 89.3%, a difference of 2.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.8% compared to 55.2%, a difference of 6.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.2% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 11.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Croatia and Immigrants from Sweden communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 38.5%), professional degree (5.3% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 27.1%), and master's degree (17.3% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 17.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4th grade (97.8% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.13%), 5th grade (97.6% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.13%), and 3rd grade (98.0% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.14%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Croatia and Immigrants from Sweden communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 21.3%), ambulatory disability (6.0% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 8.5%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 6.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.35%), disability age over 75 (45.5% compared to 45.1%, a difference of 0.80%), and cognitive disability (16.4% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 1.7%).