Immigrants from Taiwan vs Immigrants from Sweden Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 138,122,860 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Sweden within Immigrant from Taiwan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.041. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Taiwan within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.001% in Immigrants from Sweden. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Taiwan corresponds to a decrease of 1.0 Immigrants from Sweden.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Taiwan and Immigrants from Sweden communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($116,460 compared to $100,699, a difference of 15.7%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($129,122 compared to $112,010, a difference of 15.3%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($135,508 compared to $118,318, a difference of 14.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of per capita income ($57,742 compared to $55,582, a difference of 3.9%), wage/income gap (29.5% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 4.9%), and median female earnings ($49,256 compared to $44,774, a difference of 10.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Taiwan and Immigrants from Sweden communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (11.6% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 31.8%), child poverty among boys under 16 (11.0% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 30.3%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (11.0% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 28.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.4% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 1.9%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.7% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 4.7%), and married-couple family poverty (4.1% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 5.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Taiwan and Immigrants from Sweden communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (15.8% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 11.1%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.0% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 10.2%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.3% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 10.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female unemployment (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.17%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.79%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.2% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 0.82%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Taiwan and Immigrants from Sweden communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.0% compared to 35.9%, a difference of 15.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.5% compared to 74.2%, a difference of 3.8%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 0.77%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (80.0% compared to 79.8%, a difference of 0.23%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.5% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.33%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.3% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 0.36%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Taiwan and Immigrants from Sweden communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (23.0% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 24.0%), divorced or separated (9.8% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 18.4%), and single mother households (4.7% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 14.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.24 compared to 3.14, a difference of 3.3%), currently married (50.7% compared to 47.8%, a difference of 6.1%), and family households (68.0% compared to 62.5%, a difference of 8.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Taiwan and Immigrants from Sweden communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 40.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.5% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 22.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.1% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 15.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 89.3%, a difference of 3.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.7% compared to 55.2%, a difference of 8.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.1% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 15.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Taiwan and Immigrants from Sweden communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 21.3%), doctorate degree (3.2% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 11.6%), and master's degree (22.5% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 10.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (92.8% compared to 92.8%, a difference of 0.070%), high school diploma (91.0% compared to 91.1%, a difference of 0.13%), and 11th grade (93.6% compared to 93.9%, a difference of 0.32%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Taiwan and Immigrants from Sweden communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (7.8% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 26.4%), disability age 5 to 17 (4.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 24.8%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.4% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 18.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (45.5% compared to 45.1%, a difference of 0.87%), self-care disability (2.2% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 2.6%), and cognitive disability (15.7% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 6.0%).