Dutch West Indian vs Immigrants from Sweden Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 50,188,577 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Sweden within Dutch West Indian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.978. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Dutch West Indians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.108% in Immigrants from Sweden. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Dutch West Indians corresponds to an increase of 107.9 Immigrants from Sweden.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Dutch West Indian and Immigrants from Sweden communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($35,922 compared to $55,582, a difference of 54.7%), median family income ($81,852 compared to $122,765, a difference of 50.0%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($79,171 compared to $118,318, a difference of 49.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.3% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 6.6%), householder income under 25 years ($45,816 compared to $53,621, a difference of 17.0%), and median female earnings ($34,106 compared to $44,774, a difference of 31.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Dutch West Indian and Immigrants from Sweden communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (14.3% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 54.4%), child poverty under the age of 5 (23.3% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 52.6%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (21.8% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 52.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.5% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 16.4%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (24.5% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 18.1%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.4% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 23.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Dutch West Indian and Immigrants from Sweden communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.5% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 44.4%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.2% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 34.0%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (8.2% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 29.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (12.1% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 5.1%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.9% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 5.5%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.5% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 8.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Dutch West Indian and Immigrants from Sweden communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (78.2% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 6.0%), in labor force | age > 16 (61.7% compared to 65.2%, a difference of 5.7%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (75.5% compared to 79.8%, a difference of 5.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (73.7% compared to 74.2%, a difference of 0.72%), in labor force | age 16-19 (35.6% compared to 35.9%, a difference of 0.86%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (81.1% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 5.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Dutch West Indian and Immigrants from Sweden communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 35.4%), births to unmarried women (38.4% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 34.6%), and single father households (2.6% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 27.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.2% compared to 26.5%, a difference of 2.6%), family households (64.3% compared to 62.5%, a difference of 2.9%), and average family size (3.23 compared to 3.14, a difference of 3.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Dutch West Indian and Immigrants from Sweden communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.1% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 15.6%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.9% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 9.0%), and no vehicles in household (11.2% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 3.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.0% compared to 89.3%, a difference of 0.27%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.6% compared to 55.2%, a difference of 0.59%), and no vehicles in household (11.2% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 3.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Dutch West Indian and Immigrants from Sweden communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.1% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 116.3%), doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 115.1%), and master's degree (10.6% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 90.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.29%), kindergarten (98.0% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.29%), and 1st grade (98.0% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.30%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Dutch West Indian and Immigrants from Sweden communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 80.8%), vision disability (3.2% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 59.7%), and disability age 35 to 64 (15.6% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 57.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 8.9%), disability age over 75 (51.5% compared to 45.1%, a difference of 14.1%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.7% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 28.2%).