Immigrants from Canada vs Immigrants from Sweden Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 160,531,032 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Sweden within Immigrant from Canada communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.425. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Canada within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.029% in Immigrants from Sweden. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Canada corresponds to an increase of 29.0 Immigrants from Sweden.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Canada and Immigrants from Sweden communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($49,412 compared to $55,582, a difference of 12.5%), median household income ($92,029 compared to $100,699, a difference of 9.4%), and median family income ($112,374 compared to $122,765, a difference of 9.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,411 compared to $53,621, a difference of 0.39%), wage/income gap (28.5% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 1.4%), and householder income over 65 years ($64,952 compared to $69,722, a difference of 7.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Canada and Immigrants from Sweden communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (16.5% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 8.9%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.5% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 6.6%), and single male poverty (12.8% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 5.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty (12.3% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 0.45%), poverty (11.3% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 0.86%), and male poverty (10.2% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Canada and Immigrants from Sweden communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 20.9%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.6% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 15.6%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.1% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 13.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male unemployment (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.040%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 0.43%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Canada and Immigrants from Sweden communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.9% compared to 35.9%, a difference of 8.5%), in labor force | age > 16 (63.7% compared to 65.2%, a difference of 2.4%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.9% compared to 74.2%, a difference of 2.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (82.5% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 0.53%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.8% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 0.67%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.2% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.71%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Canada and Immigrants from Sweden communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (30.4% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 6.7%), single father households (2.2% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 4.2%), and single mother households (5.6% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 4.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.5% compared to 26.5%, a difference of 0.15%), average family size (3.12 compared to 3.14, a difference of 0.67%), and currently married (48.8% compared to 47.8%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Canada and Immigrants from Sweden communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 24.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 6.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.2% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 5.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 89.3%, a difference of 2.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.5% compared to 55.2%, a difference of 4.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.2% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 5.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Canada and Immigrants from Sweden communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 27.0%), professional degree (5.3% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 25.4%), and master's degree (17.2% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 17.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (92.8% compared to 92.8%, a difference of 0.050%), high school diploma (91.1% compared to 91.1%, a difference of 0.060%), and 11th grade (94.0% compared to 93.9%, a difference of 0.090%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Canada and Immigrants from Sweden communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 34.9%), hearing disability (3.5% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 14.9%), and male disability (11.9% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 11.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.5% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 1.1%), disability age over 75 (45.7% compared to 45.1%, a difference of 1.2%), and disability age 65 to 74 (22.1% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 5.1%).