Cajun vs Immigrants from South Eastern Asia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 145,664,379 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from South Eastern Asia within Cajun communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.121. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Cajuns within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.029% in Immigrants from South Eastern Asia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Cajuns corresponds to an increase of 28.5 Immigrants from South Eastern Asia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Cajun and Immigrants from South Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (33.9% compared to 24.8%, a difference of 36.6%), median household income ($70,605 compared to $91,541, a difference of 29.6%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($83,015 compared to $106,109, a difference of 27.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($52,325 compared to $55,241, a difference of 5.6%), median earnings ($42,189 compared to $47,671, a difference of 13.0%), and per capita income ($37,527 compared to $43,539, a difference of 16.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Cajun and Immigrants from South Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (19.1% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 66.7%), single father poverty (23.1% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 60.8%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (19.9% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 59.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.9% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 9.8%), married-couple family poverty (5.6% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 10.3%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (14.0% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 14.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Cajun and Immigrants from South Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (12.5% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 46.3%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.8% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 31.7%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.2% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 27.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.060%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 2.4%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.5% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 5.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Cajun and Immigrants from South Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (61.8% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 6.7%), in labor force | age 16-19 (37.8% compared to 35.6%, a difference of 6.1%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (78.1% compared to 82.8%, a difference of 6.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.1% compared to 75.1%, a difference of 0.090%), in labor force | age 25-29 (82.5% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 2.3%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (81.5% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 3.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Cajun and Immigrants from South Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (41.0% compared to 30.4%, a difference of 34.9%), divorced or separated (13.4% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 17.1%), and single mother households (7.3% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 16.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (47.1% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 0.11%), single father households (2.5% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 1.9%), and family households (64.8% compared to 67.5%, a difference of 4.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Cajun and Immigrants from South Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 38.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 23.1%, a difference of 19.7%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.7% compared to 59.6%, a difference of 3.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.7% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 0.26%), no vehicles in household (8.4% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 2.0%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.7% compared to 59.6%, a difference of 3.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Cajun and Immigrants from South Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 68.4%), master's degree (11.0% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 27.4%), and bachelor's degree (29.6% compared to 36.8%, a difference of 24.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of high school diploma (87.3% compared to 87.2%, a difference of 0.080%), 11th grade (91.4% compared to 90.9%, a difference of 0.50%), and 12th grade, no diploma (89.1% compared to 89.6%, a difference of 0.55%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Cajun and Immigrants from South Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (3.1% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 45.5%), disability age 35 to 64 (15.3% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 45.2%), and disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 40.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (50.7% compared to 48.7%, a difference of 4.1%), cognitive disability (17.8% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 4.5%), and self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 16.6%).