Ecuadorian vs Immigrants from South Eastern Asia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 310,090,896 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from South Eastern Asia within Ecuadorian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.082. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Ecuadorians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.010% in Immigrants from South Eastern Asia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Ecuadorians corresponds to a decrease of 10.1 Immigrants from South Eastern Asia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Immigrants from South Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($54,958 compared to $64,089, a difference of 16.6%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($93,739 compared to $106,109, a difference of 13.2%), and median family income ($95,114 compared to $106,252, a difference of 11.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,911 compared to $55,714, a difference of 3.3%), median female earnings ($39,117 compared to $40,558, a difference of 3.7%), and per capita income ($41,958 compared to $43,539, a difference of 3.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Immigrants from South Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (14.9% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 34.3%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (14.0% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 29.5%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.7% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 28.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.1% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 7.5%), single male poverty (12.5% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 9.2%), and single female poverty (21.6% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 12.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Immigrants from South Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.5% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 22.1%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.0% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 21.7%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (20.5% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 20.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.6% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 0.69%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.6% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 9.4%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.9% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 10.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Immigrants from South Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.4% compared to 35.6%, a difference of 13.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (72.4% compared to 75.1%, a difference of 3.7%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.3% compared to 82.8%, a difference of 0.66%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.2% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.010%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.4% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 0.060%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.4% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.35%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Immigrants from South Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.2% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 14.3%), married-couple households (43.5% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 11.4%), and births to unmarried women (33.3% compared to 30.4%, a difference of 9.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father households (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 0.97%), average family size (3.32 compared to 3.36, a difference of 1.2%), and divorced or separated (11.7% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Immigrants from South Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (22.8% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 164.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.5% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 84.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 23.1%, a difference of 64.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (77.9% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 17.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (42.0% compared to 59.6%, a difference of 42.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 23.1%, a difference of 64.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Immigrants from South Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 17.9%), college, under 1 year (59.3% compared to 64.5%, a difference of 8.7%), and college, 1 year or more (54.3% compared to 58.5%, a difference of 7.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.1% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 0.070%), kindergarten (97.0% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 0.070%), and 1st grade (97.0% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 0.070%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Immigrants from South Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.5% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 17.9%), disability age 18 to 34 (5.8% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 8.1%), and vision disability (2.3% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 7.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability (11.2% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 1.0%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.7% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 1.1%), and cognitive disability (17.2% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 1.2%).