Barbadian vs Immigrants from South Eastern Asia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 139,494,999 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from South Eastern Asia within Barbadian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.132. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Barbadians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.136% in Immigrants from South Eastern Asia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Barbadians corresponds to a decrease of 136.4 Immigrants from South Eastern Asia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Barbadian and Immigrants from South Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (19.0% compared to 24.8%, a difference of 30.8%), householder income over 65 years ($54,163 compared to $64,089, a difference of 18.3%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($90,266 compared to $106,109, a difference of 17.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($41,261 compared to $40,558, a difference of 1.7%), per capita income ($42,406 compared to $43,539, a difference of 2.7%), and median earnings ($45,846 compared to $47,671, a difference of 4.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Barbadian and Immigrants from South Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (16.5% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 48.9%), family poverty (11.3% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 33.0%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (14.4% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 32.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single female poverty (21.8% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 13.0%), single mother poverty (30.7% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 13.1%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.7% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 16.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Barbadian and Immigrants from South Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (22.5% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 31.3%), male unemployment (6.9% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 27.7%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (12.9% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 26.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.5% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 0.35%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.7% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 5.6%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.4% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 9.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Barbadian and Immigrants from South Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.0% compared to 35.6%, a difference of 14.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.1% compared to 75.1%, a difference of 5.6%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.6% compared to 82.8%, a difference of 1.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.3% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.11%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.6% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.13%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.9% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 0.59%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Barbadian and Immigrants from South Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.9% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 25.5%), married-couple households (39.4% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 22.9%), and births to unmarried women (37.0% compared to 30.4%, a difference of 21.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.29 compared to 3.36, a difference of 2.0%), divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 5.8%), and family households (62.5% compared to 67.5%, a difference of 8.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Barbadian and Immigrants from South Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (26.1% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 203.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (3.9% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 110.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (12.6% compared to 23.1%, a difference of 83.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (74.0% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 23.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (38.3% compared to 59.6%, a difference of 55.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (12.6% compared to 23.1%, a difference of 83.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Barbadian and Immigrants from South Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.6% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 11.5%), doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 6.8%), and college, under 1 year (61.1% compared to 64.5%, a difference of 5.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (92.2% compared to 92.1%, a difference of 0.16%), 11th grade (90.8% compared to 90.9%, a difference of 0.17%), and 9th grade (93.5% compared to 93.3%, a difference of 0.18%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Barbadian and Immigrants from South Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.5% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 17.5%), ambulatory disability (6.8% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 14.7%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.9% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 14.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.0% compared to 48.7%, a difference of 1.3%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.1% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 2.3%), and male disability (11.2% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 2.8%).