Czech vs Immigrants from South Eastern Asia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 453,242,605 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from South Eastern Asia within Czech communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.401. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Czechs within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.015% in Immigrants from South Eastern Asia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Czechs corresponds to a decrease of 15.5 Immigrants from South Eastern Asia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Czech and Immigrants from South Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (29.2% compared to 24.8%, a difference of 17.6%), householder income under 25 years ($51,421 compared to $55,714, a difference of 8.4%), and median household income ($86,164 compared to $91,541, a difference of 6.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median family income ($105,839 compared to $106,252, a difference of 0.39%), median earnings ($47,221 compared to $47,671, a difference of 0.95%), and median male earnings ($56,546 compared to $55,241, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Czech and Immigrants from South Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 26.5%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.0% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 20.2%), and receiving food stamps (9.2% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 20.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty under the age of 5 (15.5% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 0.89%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.9% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 3.3%), and single mother poverty (28.9% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 6.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Czech and Immigrants from South Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment (4.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 22.9%), female unemployment (4.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 22.3%), and male unemployment (4.5% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 18.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.7% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 5.4%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.6% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 5.8%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.0% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 6.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Czech and Immigrants from South Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.6% compared to 35.6%, a difference of 22.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (78.5% compared to 75.1%, a difference of 4.5%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.6% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 1.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.4% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 0.76%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.5% compared to 79.8%, a difference of 0.92%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.5% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.93%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Czech and Immigrants from South Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.6% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 11.5%), average family size (3.11 compared to 3.36, a difference of 8.0%), and currently married (49.9% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 6.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (30.5% compared to 30.4%, a difference of 0.55%), married-couple households (49.4% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 2.1%), and single father households (2.3% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 4.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Czech and Immigrants from South Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (6.9% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 25.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 11.9%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (61.5% compared to 59.6%, a difference of 3.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (93.3% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 2.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.5% compared to 23.1%, a difference of 2.6%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (61.5% compared to 59.6%, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Czech and Immigrants from South Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 94.1%), doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 9.7%), and professional degree (4.4% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 8.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.6% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 1.5%), kindergarten (98.6% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 1.5%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Czech and Immigrants from South Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 35.1%), hearing disability (3.5% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 19.0%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.2% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 15.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 0.0%), ambulatory disability (6.0% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 1.5%), and female disability (12.1% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 3.5%).