Central American Indian vs Immigrants from Singapore Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 118,485,762 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Singapore within Central American Indian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.519. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Central American Indians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.058% in Immigrants from Singapore. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Central American Indians corresponds to an increase of 58.2 Immigrants from Singapore.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Central American Indian and Immigrants from Singapore communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($37,699 compared to $58,353, a difference of 54.8%), median family income ($88,034 compared to $134,818, a difference of 53.1%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($82,355 compared to $124,429, a difference of 51.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($48,643 compared to $56,835, a difference of 16.8%), wage/income gap (22.7% compared to 28.9%, a difference of 27.6%), and median female earnings ($35,930 compared to $47,986, a difference of 33.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Central American Indian and Immigrants from Singapore communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (17.1% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 105.7%), married-couple family poverty (8.3% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 102.6%), and family poverty (13.3% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 87.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (22.6% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 8.3%), single mother poverty (34.3% compared to 25.8%, a difference of 33.1%), and single female poverty (25.5% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 38.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Central American Indian and Immigrants from Singapore communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.6% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 52.2%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.7% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 37.5%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.6% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 34.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.1% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 3.8%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 8.0%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.7% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 8.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Central American Indian and Immigrants from Singapore communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (63.4% compared to 66.2%, a difference of 4.4%), in labor force | age 45-54 (80.0% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 4.1%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (77.1% compared to 79.9%, a difference of 3.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (72.7% compared to 72.4%, a difference of 0.40%), in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 33.5%, a difference of 1.7%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (83.0% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Central American Indian and Immigrants from Singapore communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.6% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 52.6%), births to unmarried women (39.0% compared to 25.6%, a difference of 52.0%), and single father households (2.7% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 42.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.9% compared to 27.8%, a difference of 0.47%), family households (65.2% compared to 63.1%, a difference of 3.3%), and average family size (3.35 compared to 3.16, a difference of 6.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Central American Indian and Immigrants from Singapore communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 9.1%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.0% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 3.2%), and no vehicles in household (13.3% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 3.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.7% compared to 87.2%, a difference of 0.54%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.5% compared to 53.9%, a difference of 2.6%), and no vehicles in household (13.3% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 3.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Central American Indian and Immigrants from Singapore communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 141.0%), professional degree (3.6% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 113.2%), and master's degree (12.4% compared to 23.4%, a difference of 88.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.2% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 1.1%), kindergarten (97.2% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 1.1%), and 1st grade (97.1% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Central American Indian and Immigrants from Singapore communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (3.0% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 69.1%), disability age 35 to 64 (13.0% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 46.1%), and ambulatory disability (7.2% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 43.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.2% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 3.9%), disability age over 75 (50.5% compared to 45.6%, a difference of 10.7%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.9% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 21.5%).