Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Singapore Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 74,697,000 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Singapore within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.087. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.006% in Immigrants from Singapore. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to a decrease of 5.7 Immigrants from Singapore.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Singapore communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($36,475 compared to $58,353, a difference of 60.0%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($77,929 compared to $124,429, a difference of 59.7%), and median family income ($85,356 compared to $134,818, a difference of 58.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 28.9%, a difference of 6.5%), householder income under 25 years ($44,763 compared to $56,835, a difference of 27.0%), and householder income over 65 years ($53,732 compared to $72,963, a difference of 35.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Singapore communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (21.8% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 68.7%), child poverty among boys under 16 (19.8% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 58.6%), and receiving food stamps (13.1% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 57.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 0.010%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 5.8%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (24.5% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 17.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Singapore communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.0% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 42.3%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.2% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 25.2%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.9% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 19.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.2% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 0.050%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.58%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.2% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 0.69%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Singapore communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 33.5%, a difference of 14.4%), in labor force | age > 16 (62.3% compared to 66.2%, a difference of 6.2%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (79.0% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 5.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 72.4%, a difference of 2.9%), in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 3.7%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 4.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Singapore communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.8% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 47.4%), single mother households (7.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 42.0%), and births to unmarried women (36.3% compared to 25.6%, a difference of 41.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.19 compared to 3.16, a difference of 1.0%), family households with children (28.2% compared to 27.8%, a difference of 1.5%), and family households (64.4% compared to 63.1%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Singapore communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 64.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 25.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 20.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 87.2%, a difference of 5.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 53.9%, a difference of 9.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 20.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Singapore communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 143.9%), professional degree (3.4% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 130.4%), and master's degree (11.4% compared to 23.4%, a difference of 105.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 8th grade (96.4% compared to 96.4%, a difference of 0.020%), 7th grade (96.7% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 0.11%), and 4th grade (98.0% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.14%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Singapore communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 80.7%), vision disability (3.2% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 76.5%), and hearing disability (4.5% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 68.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.5% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 5.7%), disability age over 75 (51.2% compared to 45.6%, a difference of 12.2%), and self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 34.3%).