Navajo vs Immigrants from Singapore Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 95,983,260 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Singapore within Navajo communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.696. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Navajo within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.005% in Immigrants from Singapore. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Navajo corresponds to an increase of 5.5 Immigrants from Singapore.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Navajo and Immigrants from Singapore communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($29,031 compared to $58,353, a difference of 101.0%), median family income ($70,989 compared to $134,818, a difference of 89.9%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($66,529 compared to $124,429, a difference of 87.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (22.4% compared to 28.9%, a difference of 29.3%), householder income under 25 years ($42,380 compared to $56,835, a difference of 34.1%), and median female earnings ($33,046 compared to $47,986, a difference of 45.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Navajo and Immigrants from Singapore communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (11.9% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 189.5%), family poverty (18.8% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 165.0%), and receiving food stamps (21.1% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 153.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (30.3% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 45.3%), single mother poverty (40.2% compared to 25.8%, a difference of 55.9%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (19.4% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 66.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Navajo and Immigrants from Singapore communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (9.3% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 126.0%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (13.5% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 114.2%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (10.6% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 113.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.1% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 12.2%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (6.3% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 26.8%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (6.9% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 32.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Navajo and Immigrants from Singapore communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (56.6% compared to 66.2%, a difference of 17.0%), in labor force | age 30-34 (73.8% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 15.7%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (69.2% compared to 79.9%, a difference of 15.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (32.1% compared to 33.5%, a difference of 4.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (64.8% compared to 72.4%, a difference of 11.7%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (74.6% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 13.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Navajo and Immigrants from Singapore communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (51.5% compared to 25.6%, a difference of 100.9%), single mother households (8.8% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 78.3%), and single father households (3.2% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 70.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.9% compared to 27.8%, a difference of 3.2%), family households (66.4% compared to 63.1%, a difference of 5.2%), and average family size (3.65 compared to 3.16, a difference of 15.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Navajo and Immigrants from Singapore communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 38.6%), no vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 37.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.3% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 20.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (55.3% compared to 53.9%, a difference of 2.8%), 1 or more vehicles in household (90.8% compared to 87.2%, a difference of 4.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.3% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 20.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Navajo and Immigrants from Singapore communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 172.6%), professional degree (2.9% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 169.5%), and master's degree (9.4% compared to 23.4%, a difference of 148.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1st grade (97.9% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.24%), kindergarten (98.0% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.25%), and nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.26%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Navajo and Immigrants from Singapore communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (4.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 74.8%), vision disability (3.1% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 74.6%), and disability age 35 to 64 (15.5% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 73.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.8% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 7.2%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 15.4%), and disability age over 75 (58.3% compared to 45.6%, a difference of 27.7%).