Immigrants from Uganda vs Immigrants from Russia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 114,207,730 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Russia within Immigrant from Uganda communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.641. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Uganda within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.123% in Immigrants from Russia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Uganda corresponds to an increase of 122.8 Immigrants from Russia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uganda and Immigrants from Russia communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($45,043 compared to $52,044, a difference of 15.5%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($95,698 compared to $108,751, a difference of 13.6%), and median male earnings ($56,064 compared to $63,326, a difference of 13.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($61,976 compared to $64,512, a difference of 4.1%), wage/income gap (24.9% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 5.8%), and householder income under 25 years ($52,374 compared to $55,891, a difference of 6.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uganda and Immigrants from Russia communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (17.7% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 18.2%), child poverty under the age of 16 (16.8% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 16.2%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (17.0% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 15.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (28.3% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 3.2%), married-couple family poverty (5.2% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 3.4%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.1% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 3.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uganda and Immigrants from Russia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.7% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 23.5%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.4% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 11.3%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.5% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 10.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.2% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 1.2%), female unemployment (5.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 1.2%), and male unemployment (5.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uganda and Immigrants from Russia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.2% compared to 34.1%, a difference of 15.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.0% compared to 73.5%, a difference of 3.5%), and in labor force | age > 16 (67.5% compared to 65.3%, a difference of 3.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.2% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 0.14%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.0% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.34%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.7% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 0.62%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uganda and Immigrants from Russia communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.4% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 21.8%), single mother households (6.6% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 19.5%), and births to unmarried women (30.5% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 12.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (62.7% compared to 63.2%, a difference of 0.69%), average family size (3.23 compared to 3.16, a difference of 2.2%), and divorced or separated (11.7% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 3.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uganda and Immigrants from Russia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.0% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 51.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.9% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 11.4%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (55.0% compared to 50.3%, a difference of 9.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.1% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 5.4%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.4% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 8.7%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (55.0% compared to 50.3%, a difference of 9.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uganda and Immigrants from Russia communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.0% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 19.8%), master's degree (16.6% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 16.6%), and doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 13.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2nd grade (97.8% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.11%), 3rd grade (97.7% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.12%), and nursery school (97.9% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.14%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uganda and Immigrants from Russia communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (5.8% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 14.2%), disability age 35 to 64 (11.2% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 13.7%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 10.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.8% compared to 47.0%, a difference of 0.40%), female disability (11.8% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 1.0%), and hearing disability (2.9% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 1.5%).