Mexican American Indian vs Immigrants from Russia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 235,815,555 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Russia within Mexican American Indian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.771. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Mexican American Indians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.370% in Immigrants from Russia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Mexican American Indians corresponds to an increase of 370.2 Immigrants from Russia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Mexican American Indian and Immigrants from Russia communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($37,407 compared to $52,044, a difference of 39.1%), median male earnings ($47,990 compared to $63,326, a difference of 32.0%), and median family income ($90,918 compared to $116,942, a difference of 28.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (24.7% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 6.7%), householder income under 25 years ($51,783 compared to $55,891, a difference of 7.9%), and householder income over 65 years ($56,089 compared to $64,512, a difference of 15.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Mexican American Indian and Immigrants from Russia communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 16 (19.3% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 33.7%), child poverty among girls under 16 (19.5% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 33.1%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (19.9% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 32.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.5% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 0.33%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.6% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 1.3%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.4% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 4.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Mexican American Indian and Immigrants from Russia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.5% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 27.8%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 18.8%), and female unemployment (6.0% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 15.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.6% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 2.2%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.8% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 3.2%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.9% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 3.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Mexican American Indian and Immigrants from Russia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.0% compared to 34.1%, a difference of 5.5%), in labor force | age 45-54 (80.7% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 3.0%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.4% compared to 73.5%, a difference of 2.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.9% compared to 65.3%, a difference of 0.66%), in labor force | age 25-29 (83.0% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 2.2%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (78.2% compared to 79.9%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Mexican American Indian and Immigrants from Russia communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.8% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 43.9%), single mother households (7.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 34.0%), and births to unmarried women (35.7% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 31.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (45.9% compared to 47.0%, a difference of 2.3%), divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 6.0%), and family households (67.0% compared to 63.2%, a difference of 6.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Mexican American Indian and Immigrants from Russia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.1% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 66.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 58.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.3% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 37.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.0% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 6.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.7% compared to 50.3%, a difference of 16.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.3% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 37.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Mexican American Indian and Immigrants from Russia communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.3% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 84.9%), doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 82.3%), and master's degree (11.2% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 72.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.9% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 1.2%), kindergarten (96.8% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 1.2%), and 1st grade (96.8% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Mexican American Indian and Immigrants from Russia communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (12.0% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 22.3%), disability age 65 to 74 (26.2% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 21.0%), and vision disability (2.4% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 19.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 3.8%), hearing disability (3.0% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 4.5%), and female disability (12.3% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 5.6%).