Immigrants from Chile vs Immigrants from Russia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 186,685,077 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Russia within Immigrant from Chile communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.491. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Chile within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.076% in Immigrants from Russia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Chile corresponds to an increase of 76.2 Immigrants from Russia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Immigrants from Russia communities in the United States are seen in median male earnings ($55,954 compared to $63,326, a difference of 13.2%), per capita income ($46,213 compared to $52,044, a difference of 12.6%), and median earnings ($47,697 compared to $53,457, a difference of 12.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.7% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 2.6%), householder income over 65 years ($62,354 compared to $64,512, a difference of 3.5%), and householder income under 25 years ($52,440 compared to $55,891, a difference of 6.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Immigrants from Russia communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (16.4% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 9.7%), child poverty under the age of 16 (15.7% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 8.7%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (15.9% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 8.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.4% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 0.13%), single father poverty (15.7% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 1.4%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.3% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Immigrants from Russia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.3% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 9.7%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.8% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 6.6%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.5% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 5.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.23%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.36%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.68%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Immigrants from Russia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.8% compared to 34.1%, a difference of 2.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.1% compared to 73.5%, a difference of 0.93%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.9% compared to 65.3%, a difference of 0.90%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (83.2% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 0.040%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.9% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 0.050%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.1% compared to 79.9%, a difference of 0.14%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Immigrants from Russia communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (31.2% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 14.9%), single mother households (6.3% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 13.7%), and single father households (2.2% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 12.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (46.5% compared to 47.0%, a difference of 0.95%), family households (64.6% compared to 63.2%, a difference of 2.2%), and average family size (3.24 compared to 3.16, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Immigrants from Russia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 37.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 14.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 11.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.1% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 4.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.2% compared to 50.3%, a difference of 7.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 11.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Immigrants from Russia communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 19.8%), master's degree (16.8% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 15.7%), and professional degree (5.3% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 14.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (97.8% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.14%), nursery school (97.9% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.15%), and 1st grade (97.8% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.15%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Immigrants from Russia communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 19.5%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 7.1%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 6.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male disability (10.6% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 0.30%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.1% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 0.49%), and disability (11.0% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 0.71%).