Pima vs Immigrants from Russia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 54,933,755 people shows a significant negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Russia within Pima communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.602. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Pima within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.058% in Immigrants from Russia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Pima corresponds to a decrease of 57.8 Immigrants from Russia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Russia communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($30,644 compared to $52,044, a difference of 69.8%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($73,365 compared to $113,215, a difference of 54.3%), and median household income ($63,262 compared to $96,378, a difference of 52.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,503 compared to $55,891, a difference of 8.5%), wage/income gap (21.1% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 24.9%), and median female earnings ($35,326 compared to $44,680, a difference of 26.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Russia communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (11.4% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 127.2%), family poverty (18.4% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 123.1%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (25.3% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 108.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (14.8% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 4.7%), single mother poverty (38.6% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 40.8%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (28.4% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 46.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Russia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (11.8% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 155.9%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (11.7% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 123.0%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (18.9% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 118.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 3.3%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 10.5%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (6.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 23.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Russia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-64 (69.0% compared to 79.9%, a difference of 15.8%), in labor force | age 25-29 (74.3% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 14.3%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (72.8% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 14.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 34.1%, a difference of 0.050%), in labor force | age 20-24 (69.0% compared to 73.5%, a difference of 6.5%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (79.0% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 8.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Russia communities in the United States are seen in single father households (4.2% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 113.4%), births to unmarried women (51.5% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 89.6%), and single mother households (8.3% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 50.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.1% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 1.3%), family households (65.9% compared to 63.2%, a difference of 4.4%), and divorced or separated (12.9% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 13.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Russia communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 47.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.0% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 30.3%), and no vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 6.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.3% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 0.99%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.0% compared to 50.3%, a difference of 3.4%), and no vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 6.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Russia communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (9.2% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 109.8%), bachelor's degree (23.2% compared to 45.4%, a difference of 95.7%), and doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 91.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 6th grade (97.2% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 0.10%), 7th grade (96.1% compared to 96.2%, a difference of 0.11%), and 5th grade (97.6% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.15%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Russia communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (38.6% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 78.7%), vision disability (3.3% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 66.1%), and disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 63.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 1.3%), self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 10.0%), and cognitive disability (18.8% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 11.9%).