Hawaiian vs Immigrants from Middle Africa Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 155,474,402 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Middle Africa within Hawaiian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.218. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Hawaiians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.018% in Immigrants from Middle Africa. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Hawaiians corresponds to an increase of 17.6 Immigrants from Middle Africa.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Immigrants from Middle Africa communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (24.9% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 11.2%), householder income over 65 years ($64,920 compared to $58,375, a difference of 11.2%), and householder income under 25 years ($53,078 compared to $47,916, a difference of 10.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of per capita income ($39,403 compared to $39,529, a difference of 0.32%), median earnings ($43,673 compared to $43,416, a difference of 0.59%), and median female earnings ($37,497 compared to $37,965, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Immigrants from Middle Africa communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.7% compared to 22.1%, a difference of 17.9%), child poverty among girls under 16 (16.6% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 16.0%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (16.4% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 15.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (12.9% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 0.010%), single male poverty (12.6% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 0.66%), and single father poverty (15.1% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 3.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Immigrants from Middle Africa communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.1% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 12.9%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.3% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 11.7%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.9% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 11.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female unemployment (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.12%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.6% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 0.23%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.4% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 0.60%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Immigrants from Middle Africa communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 67.7%, a difference of 4.7%), in labor force | age 16-19 (38.4% compared to 39.9%, a difference of 4.0%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (83.0% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 2.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (77.0% compared to 76.6%, a difference of 0.54%), in labor force | age 35-44 (83.2% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 2.0%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.5% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Immigrants from Middle Africa communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.6% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 17.1%), married-couple households (47.8% compared to 41.8%, a difference of 14.4%), and family households (67.4% compared to 61.9%, a difference of 8.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (28.7% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 2.6%), average family size (3.41 compared to 3.25, a difference of 4.9%), and divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 5.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Immigrants from Middle Africa communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.9% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 54.4%), 3 or more vehicles in household (24.3% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 33.1%), and no vehicles in household (8.0% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 26.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.0% compared to 89.9%, a difference of 2.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.4% compared to 53.4%, a difference of 13.1%), and no vehicles in household (8.0% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 26.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Immigrants from Middle Africa communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 29.4%), master's degree (11.6% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 26.0%), and professional degree (3.4% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 22.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.9% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.28%), kindergarten (97.9% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.29%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.29%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Immigrants from Middle Africa communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.5% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 25.3%), self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 11.9%), and male disability (12.3% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 10.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (6.9% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 0.30%), disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 1.3%), and disability age 35 to 64 (12.3% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 3.1%).