Taiwanese vs Immigrants from Middle Africa Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 28,336,227 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Middle Africa within Taiwanese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.019. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Taiwanese within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.031% in Immigrants from Middle Africa. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Taiwanese corresponds to an increase of 30.8 Immigrants from Middle Africa.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Taiwanese and Immigrants from Middle Africa communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($101,492 compared to $82,254, a difference of 23.4%), per capita income ($46,455 compared to $39,529, a difference of 17.5%), and median household income ($89,900 compared to $77,559, a difference of 15.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($49,804 compared to $47,916, a difference of 3.9%), median female earnings ($40,576 compared to $37,965, a difference of 6.9%), and householder income over 65 years ($62,894 compared to $58,375, a difference of 7.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Taiwanese and Immigrants from Middle Africa communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (14.5% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 36.2%), child poverty among girls under 16 (14.6% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 31.6%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (14.5% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 31.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.2% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 0.81%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.2% compared to 22.1%, a difference of 4.0%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.6% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 4.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Taiwanese and Immigrants from Middle Africa communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (6.5% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 41.4%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.1% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 32.9%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (6.6% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 26.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.5% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 0.42%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 1.0%), and female unemployment (5.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Taiwanese and Immigrants from Middle Africa communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (33.8% compared to 39.9%, a difference of 18.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.7% compared to 76.6%, a difference of 2.6%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.2% compared to 67.7%, a difference of 2.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 0.19%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.1% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 0.27%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.2% compared to 80.5%, a difference of 0.30%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Taiwanese and Immigrants from Middle Africa communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.8% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 34.1%), births to unmarried women (29.0% compared to 34.9%, a difference of 20.6%), and single father households (2.2% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 13.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.23 compared to 3.25, a difference of 0.62%), family households (63.3% compared to 61.9%, a difference of 2.3%), and family households with children (26.7% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 4.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Taiwanese and Immigrants from Middle Africa communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 21.3%), no vehicles in household (11.7% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 14.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.0% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 9.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (53.9% compared to 53.4%, a difference of 0.82%), 1 or more vehicles in household (88.4% compared to 89.9%, a difference of 1.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.0% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 9.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Taiwanese and Immigrants from Middle Africa communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.0% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 18.4%), master's degree (16.1% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 10.2%), and bachelor's degree (40.0% compared to 36.6%, a difference of 9.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (90.0% compared to 90.0%, a difference of 0.040%), 6th grade (96.5% compared to 96.5%, a difference of 0.060%), and kindergarten (97.5% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.070%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Taiwanese and Immigrants from Middle Africa communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (9.8% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 21.5%), disability age 5 to 17 (4.9% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 20.7%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.0% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 15.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (2.8% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 1.0%), disability age over 75 (48.2% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 2.2%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 2.6%).